answersLogoWhite

0

No such proof can exist within consistent axioms - to add 1 to Graham's number would generate a larger number, and so, by this counterexample, Graham's number cannot be the largest.

It is the largest used in a mathematical proof, because all proofs have been noted in a proof 'by exhaustion', in which all cases (in this case, proofs) have been verified to have smaller constants .

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
More answers

It is so big that it literally cannot be written down, if each digit of graham's number were written down so small that each digit took up 1 plank volume, the written number would take up a space larger than the observable universe.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Proof that grahams number is the largest number?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp