Assuming the question is: Prove that a set A which contains n elements has 2n different subsets.
Proof by induction on n:
Base case (n = 0): If A contains no elements then the only subset of A is the empty set. So A has 1 = 20 different subsets.
Induction step (n > 0): We assume the induction hypothesis for all n smaller than some arbitrary number k (k > 0) and show that if the claim holds for sets containing k - 1 elements, then the claim also holds for a set containing k elements.
Given a set A which contains k elements, let A = A' u {.} (where u denotes set union, and {.} is some arbitrary subset of A containing a single element no in A'). Then A' has k - 1 elements and it follows by the induction hypothesis that (1) A' has 2k-1 different subsets (which also are subsets of A). (2) For each of these subsets we can create a new set which is a subset of A, but not of A', by adding . to it, that is we obtain an additional 2k-1 subsets of A. (*)
So by assuming the induction hypothesis (for all n < k) we have shown that a set A containing kelements has 2k-1 + 2k-1 = 2k different subsets. QED.
(*): We see that the sets are clearly subsets of A, but have we covered all subsets of A? Yes. Assume we haven't and there is some subset S of A not covered by this method: if S contains ., then S \ {.} is a subset of A' and has been included in step (2); otherwise if . is not in S, then S is a subset of A' and has been included in step (1). So assuming there is a subset of A which is not described by this process leads to a contradiction.
A - B is null.=> there are no elements in A - B.=> there are no elements such that they are in A but not in B.=> any element in A is in B.=> A is a subset of B.
Prove that if it were true then there must be a contradiction.
You cannot prove that because it's false
You need to prove he's the father if you're seeking monetary compensation.
Prove it by induction on n, use 0 or 1 as base cases.
Consider a set, S, consisting of n elements.Then the number of subsets of S containing r objects is equal to the number of ways of choosing r elements out of n = nCr.ThereforenC0 + nC1 + nC2 + ... + nCn is the total number of subsets of S.Now consider each subset of S. Each element of S can either be in the subset or not in the subset. So for each element there are two choices. Therefore, n elements give 2^n possible subsets.Since these are two different approaches to the total number of subsets of S,nC0 + nC1 + nC2 + ... + nCn = 2^n.
Yes a set with n elements has a power set with 2n elements.
A topology is a set of elements or subsets that follows these properties:∅ and X belongs to the setAny union of the subsets belongs to the set.Any intersection of the subsets belongs to the set.Yes, any intersection of two topologies on X is always a topology on X. Consider this example:Let X = {1,2,3}, T = {∅, {1},{2},{1,2},X} and S = {∅, {1}, {3}, {1,3},X}Then, S ∩ T = {∅, X, {1}}To show that S ∩ T is a topology, we need to prove these properties:∅ and X belongs to the setAny union of the subsets belongs to the set.Any intersection of the subsets belongs to the set.Step 1: Prove the first property is followedSince the empty set and X belongs to S ∩ T, the first property is followed. That is obvious. ;)Step 2: Prove the second property is followedSelect any union of any pair of subsets. You should see that this property is also satisfied. How?∅ U X = X ∈ S ∩ T∅ U {1} = {1} ∈ S ∩ T{1} U X = X ∈ S ∩ TStep 3: Prove the third property is followedAny intersection of the subsets belong to the set obviously. See below:∅ ∩ X = ∅ ∈ S ∩ T∅ ∩ {1} = ∅ ∈ S ∩ T{1} ∩ X = {1} ∈ S ∩ TSo the intersection of two topologies on X is a topology.
One way to prove that white light contains a mixture of different colors is by passing it through a prism. The prism will refract the white light into a spectrum of colors, known as a rainbow, showing that white light is composed of various colors. This experiment demonstrates that white light is made up of a combination of different wavelengths.
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
coke
it contains carbon
You can experiement with the melting point, boiling point, and freezing point of the elements to prove they have similar properties. This and you can check the different physical and other chemical properties for similarities and comparison.
Dry it to a powder and perform the the biuret test on this powder.
A - B is null.=> there are no elements in A - B.=> there are no elements such that they are in A but not in B.=> any element in A is in B.=> A is a subset of B.
The word proven is an adjective. It descrbes something that has been proved.
Water on electrolysis (splitting) gives elements Hydrogen and oxygen in a fixed proportion