4 is a factor of 28.
4 is a divisor of 28.
7 is a factor of 28.
7 is a divisor of 28.
28 is a multiple of 7.
28 is a multiple of 4.
28 is a product of 4 and 7.
28 is divisible by 4.
28 is divisible by 7.
7 and 9 are factors and divisors of 63. 63 is a multiple and product of 7 and 9. 63 is divisible by 7 and 9.
6 x 8 = 48 6 and 8 are factors of 48. 6 and 8 are divisors of 48. 48 is a multiple of 6 and 8. 48 is a product of 6 and 8. 48 is divisible by 6 and 8.
No. Divisor is the same as factor.
To find the least prime divisor of 658, we start by testing the smallest prime numbers. Since 658 is even, it is divisible by 2. Therefore, the least prime divisor of 658 is 2.
The greatest common factor of 540 and 1430 is 10.
A product (multiple) is divisible by a factor (divisor)
7 and 9 are factors and divisors of 63. 63 is a multiple and product of 7 and 9. 63 is divisible by 7 and 9.
7 and 9 are factors and divisors of 63 63 is a multiple and a product of 7 and 9 63 is divisible by 7 and 9
7 x 9 = 63 7 is a FACTOR of 63 9 is a FACTOR of 63 7 and 9 are even DIVISORS of 63 63 is a MULTIPLE of 7 and 9 63 is a PRODUCT of 7 and 9 63 is evenly DIVISIBLE by 7 or 9
Divisible is the other word for Divisor.
6 x 8 = 48 6 and 8 are factors of 48. 6 and 8 are divisors of 48. 48 is a multiple of 6 and 8. 48 is a product of 6 and 8. 48 is divisible by 6 and 8.
A divisor is the number that does the dividing... FOr example: 6/3=2 (/ represents the division symbol) 3 is the divisor... A multiple is kind of like a pattern with times tables.... for example, 3,6, 9, 12,15.18,21 etc. 6,9,12,15,18, and 21 are all divisible by three.
No. Divisor is the same as factor.
No, the remainder in a division problem cannot equal the divisor. The remainder is defined as the amount left over after division when the dividend is not evenly divisible by the divisor. By definition, the remainder must be less than the divisor; if it were equal to the divisor, it would indicate that the dividend is divisible by the divisor, resulting in a remainder of zero.
No, because the last 2 digits are not divisible by 4. 50 is not divisible by 4 so No!
No - a number cannot be smaller than its divisor.
The divisor in this division problem is 26.