No, 3 isn't a multiple of 6 because the first multiple of 6 is 6. 3 is a factor of 6. 6 is a multiple of 3.
8 is not a factor or multiple of 3.
The Least Common Multiple of 35 and 3 is 105.
301 is not a multiple of 3. 301/3 = 100 with 1 remaining.
No, 120 is not a multiple of 17.
Assuming 2 randomly selected positive integers are multiplied together, I came up with a 5 in 12 chance (41 2/3 percent ) Here's how I figured it: take the first number and divide by six and examine the remainder (called modulo 6). You have 6 different possibilities (0,1,2,3,4,5), each with a 1 in six chance of occurring. If mod 6 = 0, then the first number is a multiple by 6, and it doesn't matter what the 2nd number is; all products are multiples of 6 as well. If mod 6 = 1 or 5, then the 2nd number must be a multiple of six to get the product to be multiple of 6. The chance of the 2nd number a multiple of six is 1 in 6. If mod 6 = 2, then these are numbers like 2,8,14,20... They are even numbers, so if the second number is a multiple of 3, then the product is multiple of 6. The chance of the 2nd number a multiple of three is 1 in 3. Mod 6 = 3, then first number is multiple of 3 (like 3,9,15,21), and the second number must be even (chance is 1 in 2). Mod 6 = 4, then first number is like 4,10,16,22 It is an even number so the 2nd number must be multiple of 3 (chance is 1 in 3). So in order how I described, we have (1 + 1/6 + 1/6 + 1/3 + 1/2 + 1/3)*(1/6) which equals 5/12.
The fifth multiple of 2 is calculated by multiplying 2 by 5, which equals 10. In mathematical terms, a multiple of a number is the result of multiplying that number by an integer. In this case, the fifth multiple of 2 is 10.
3 is not a multiple of 127, and 127 is not a multiple of 3 either.
What is a multiple of 2 and 3?A multiple of 2 and 3 is 6.
No. And it is not an uncommon multiple of 3 either. In fact, it is not a multiple of 3.
It is: 24
because 6 is a multiple of 3
No but 21 is a multiple of 3 because 7*3 = 21
The lowest multiple of 3 and 8 is 3. This is not the lowest common multiple.
Yes, it is a multiple of -1 and 3.
No - 9 is a multiple of 3.
No, 137 is not a multiple of 3.