Real numbers are composed of rational and Irrational Numbers. Integers are part of the group (set) of rational numbers. And the integers are composed of the counting numbers (1, 2, 3, ...) and their negative counterparts (-1, -2, -3, ...). Oh, almost forgot. There is one more integer that is neither positive or negative. It's the number zero. Zero is an integer (neither positive or negative). The smallest real number ever is zero.
No, it's never greater than the smallest number.
Numbers don't stop in either direction. The smallest positive number not starting with 0 is 1. The smallest negative number is infinite.
If you mean 2, 3 and 7 as factors then the smallest number is 42
Subtract the smallest number from the largest number and you will get the distance from the smallest number to the largest number. That is the range. Ex: {-2 -4 -6 3 6 7 12} Smallest number is -6, largest number is 12. 12- (-6) = 12 + 6 = 18. The distance from the smallest number to the largest is 16
12
The smallest whole number is 1. (Also known as "one" or "unity".)0 (called "zero" or "nil") means "nothing exists" so 0 cannot ever be a real number.In other words 0 certainly cannot be the smallest whole number because it simply is not a real number of any kind.
This depends on what you mean by smallest. The smallest four-digit whole number is 1,000; the smallest four-digit real number is .0001 (1/10,000); the smallest four-digit integer is -9,999.
There is no first real number. If x laid claim to being the smallest real number, then x/2 would have a better claim. And so on.
Use the following algorithm (written in pseudocode). Let largest be the lowest possible real number. Let smallest be the greatest possible real number. Repeat while there is input... { Read real number r from input. If r is greater than largest then let largest be r. If r is less than smallest then let smallest be r. } End repeat. Let range be largest minus smallest. Output range.
The smallest whole number that is greater than 617500 is 617501. There is no smallest real number satisfying the requirement because for each candidate, there is another which is halfway between it and 617500.
0.000(recurring but ending in 1)
38
Unless you are an electrical engineer or a math teacher, every number you will ever use in a real world situation will be a real number.
Well, darling, the smallest number factor of 1234 is 1, and the smallest number factor of 5 is also 1. So, in this case, the smallest number factor of both 1234 and 5 is 1. Math can be a real snooze fest sometimes, can't it?
no
This depends on the type of number you want. For integers, the answer is 105. For real numbers, the answer is -.005.
No, because the maximum (largest) must be at least as big as the minimum (smallest).