Want this question answered?
Hell yes! I had a record when I was 18 - I'm now 74 and have been raising children ever since. Having a record doesn't make you unqualified to raise children.
The most children in one family record belongs to the Feodor Vasilyevich family. The mother gave birth to 69 children in her lifetime during the 1700s.
If there is joint custody of the child then the father should be told by the mother where she is going with the child and for how long. If the mother wants to live in another State the courts will have to decide visitation rights. Example: The father has may have the child one or two weeks during the summer; possibly Christmas or alternative Christmas', etc. If the father does not have joint custody then the mother can leave with the child to another State without his permission, but to be fair to the child the father should be informed unless the father has a criminal record; drugs, etc., and is an unfit father.
Yes and no. Having a record or it does not mean it's still a problem. Since being fatherless is far more damaging, if there is a concern, set supervised visitation for a designated period of time with random drug tests. see link
No the bible does..
If you are a father. You must prove the mother unfit, drugs, abuse, prison record, etc... IF you are a mother, depending on the state you live in they would allow soul custody because you are the mother. If the father is unfit and you live in Utah and/or California where they are for the father as well and want to do joint custody in most of those two states, the father must pretty much be unfit such as abuse, drugs and/or prison record for the mother to get full custody. That is pretty much when the only time I have known any parent to get full custody of their children.
There is no record of when this happened.
A fillie's father is called a sire, same as a colt's. And just for the record their mother is called their dam.
Andrew's father was named Jonah but his mother's name is not known. There is no written record or tradition.
A birth certificate is a government record and the father should sign it in order to document the child's parents. Otherwise he will add to the problem of a generation of children whose birth records are incomplete. If he has concerns because the mother is a minor he should consult with an attorney.
Hell yes! I had a record when I was 18 - I'm now 74 and have been raising children ever since. Having a record doesn't make you unqualified to raise children.
if its taken to court and the mother has a clean record she will most likely get custody of the child and if the father does not pay child support he has no rights at all..(im going though this same thing in court) about the only way he can is if he proves that the mother is unfit
The date is unknown as in those days, as they did not keep a record of marriages and births and so on. But it was said to be some where between 1560 and 1564.
musas parent are only known to be Jews but no record about their name or personal information was give in the bible/quran.
Without referring to twins, Jayne Bleackley is the mother who holds the record for the shortest interval between two children. She gave birth to Joseph Robert on September 3rd, 1999, and Annie Jessica Joyce on March 30th, 2000. The babies were born 208 days apart.
In the South, colonial women had an average of 10-11 children to provide free labor on plantations.
The ancient Egyptian language has no words for grandmother or grandfather; you would have to say "the mother of my mother" or "the mother of my father". Hieroglyphs do not record any vowels, only consonants, so we do not know how the Egyptians pronounced the words, but they are written as: mwt mwt=i (the mother of my mother) mwt it=i (the mother of my father) Note that the letter i is used for a consonant that does not exist in English.