Wiki User
∙ 7y agoIf the GCF of two numbers is 1, their LCM will be their product. Such numbers are called relatively prime, or co-prime. Any two prime numbers (like 3 and 5) will be that way, but the numbers don't have to be prime (like 4 and 9).
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWiki User
∙ 11y agoThat happens when one of the numbers is a multiple of the other.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoThe LCM of two numbers will never be less than the GCF.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoIn that scenario, the GCF is the lesser of the numbers. The LCM is the greater.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoNot necessarily. The LCM of 12 and 6 is 12. It's better to say the LCM of two numbers is never less than the greater of the two.
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoNo, the GCF is the lesser of the numbers.
The GCF of the numbers is the greatest common factor no matter what their relationship is. When one number is a multiple of another number, the GCF is the smaller number.
There is no greatest common multiples for whatever common multiple is claimed to be the greatest the lowest common multiple of the numbers (in this case 15) can be added to get an even greater common multiple.
The answer is sometimes - when the multiple in question is 1.
The GREATEST common multiple is a number approaching infinity. The LEAST common multiple is 540.
There can be no numbers which have 5 as their greatest common multiple. If 5 is a common multiple then 10, 15, 20, ... are all common multiples and the are all greater than 5. So 5 cannot be the greatest common multiple.In fact, once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.
No, the lesser.
The GCF of the numbers is the greatest common factor no matter what their relationship is. When one number is a multiple of another number, the GCF is the smaller number.
There can never be a greatest common multiple of one number for two reasons:"Common" refers to a multiple that is common to two or more numbers. You cannot have a multiple that is common, but only to one number.If X is the greatest common multiple of a set of numbers, then any multiple of X will also be a common multiple of each member of the set and it will be greater than X. And then, any multiple of this number will be a multiple of each member of the set and will be greater still. And then ...
There is no greatest common multiples for whatever common multiple is claimed to be the greatest the lowest common multiple of the numbers (in this case 15) can be added to get an even greater common multiple.
The answer is sometimes - when the multiple in question is 1.
There is no greatest common multiple of any integers as whatever number is said to be it, the lowest common multiple of the numbers can be added to get an even greater common multiple. If you mean least common multiple (the lowest (positive) integer that can be divided by the numbers without a remainder), the answer is 312. If you mean the greatest common factor (the greatest (positive) integer that can divide into the numbers without any remainder). the answer is 4.
There is no "greatest common multiple" of any two numbers. Whatever their product is, it can be multiplied by any positive integer to yield an even greater number that is also a multiple of the first two. Thus, the number of multiples is infinite.
The greatest common multiple of any set of numbers is infinite. The greatest common multiple of any set of numbers will never be one.
The greatest common multiple of any two numbers is infinite.
There can be no greatest denominator. Suppose x is the greatest denominator of two numbers a and b. That is to say, x is a multiple of a, x is a multiple of b and x is the greatest such number. Now consider the number 2x. It is a multiple of a, it is a multiple of b and it is greater than x. This contradicts the statement that x is the greatest such number. So such an x cannot exist.
There are no such numbers because there is really no such thing as a "greatest common multiple". If the numbers have 5 as a common multiple then 10 will also be a common multiple and clearly, 10 is greater than 5. So 5 cannot be the greatest common multiple. In fact, once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.
Never. The greatest common multiple of any two numbers is infinite.