There's a bunch with four.
2 x 3 x 5 x 7 = 210
2 x 3 x 5 x 11 = 330
2 x 3 x 7 x 11 = 462
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the number they are compared to.
There are no factors of 200, prime or otherwise, that are larger than 200.
You cannot have a common factor with only one number. You must have at least 2 numbers to compare factors with.
The only number that is both a multiple of a number and a factor of that same number is the number itself. Multiples of a number are equal to or bigger than the number, while factors are equal to or smaller than the number.
91119 cannot be a factor of 20. So the question is nonsense.
You cannot. Factors are a characteristic of whole numbers.
2 cannot be a factor of an odd number, 2 must be a factor of an even number.
A prime number has only one prime factor, and that prime factor is the number itself.
Factors divide into a number. A number divides into multiples. 3 is a factor of 6. 12 is a multiple of 6. 6 is both a factor and a multiple of 6.
Common factors are factors shared by two or more numbers. A single number cannot have a common factor.
2 cannot be a factor as 215 is not an even number. Factors are 5 x 43
One number alone can only have factors, it cannot have a 'common' factor. The factors of 1701 are 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 and 7.
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the number they are compared to.
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the number they are compared to.
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the number they are compared to.
No. As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the number they are compared to.
There cannot be a common factor of just one number. To be common there need to be at least two numbers. If you find all the factors of two or more numbers, and you find some factors are the same ("common"), then the largest of those common factors is the Greatest Common Factor.