no it is because metallic character increases down the group
Chat with our AI personalities
Yes, Magnesium (Mg) has more metallic character than Calcium (Ca) because it has a smaller atomic radius and higher ionization energy, leading to stronger metallic bonding and more typical metallic properties like high electrical conductivity and ductility.
Ca is more active because it has an atom that is large. The larger the distance the smaller the force. If you want more information you should visit Which_is_more_reactive_Mg_or_Ca_Why
No, the calcium ion Ca+2 has fewer electrons than the neutral calcium atom. The calcium atom has 20 electrons, while the Ca+2 ion has 18 electrons because it has lost two electrons to become positively charged.
Without additional information about the specific element in question, it's not possible to determine which isotope is more abundant solely based on the atomic masses. The abundance of isotopes depends on various factors such as stability and nuclear properties of the specific element.
Both Ba (barium) and Ca (calcium) are metals. They are found in the alkaline earth metals group of the periodic table and exhibit typical metallic properties such as conductivity and malleability.
There are 17 elements larger than calcium (Ca) on the periodic table in calcium's period.