0
How were the contributions of Nicolaus Copernicus's and Galileo Galilei to the scientific revolution different?
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
What else can I help you with?
How were the contributions of nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo galilei to the scientific revolution different?
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
How were the contributions of Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galileo to the scientific revolution different?
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
Which scientist is known for contributions to a scientific discipline that is different from that of the other three scientists?
Archimedes.
Why was Copernicus discovery called the Copernicus revolution?
It represented a change in scientific thought
How would things be different if Galileo didnt exist?
If Galileo had not existed, the advancement of modern science, particularly in physics and astronomy, would likely have been significantly delayed. His advocacy for the scientific method and empirical observation challenged prevailing geocentric beliefs and laid the groundwork for future scientists like Newton. The lack of his contributions might have hindered the acceptance of heliocentrism and the development of key concepts such as inertia and the laws of motion. Consequently, the Scientific Revolution could have taken a different trajectory, potentially prolonging the dominance of superstition and religious dogma in scientific inquiry.
How were the contributions of nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo to the scientific revolution different?
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
How were the effects of the scientific revolution different from the effects of the industrial revolution?
The scientific revolution caused religious controversies, while the Industrial Revolution led to worker exploitation
How were the contributions of nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo galilei to the scientific revolution different?
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
How were the contributions of Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galileo to the scientific revolution different?
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
How were effects of the scientific revolution different from the effects of the enlightenment?
The scientific revolution caused religious controversies, while the Enlightenment challenged absolute monarchy.
How were the effects of scientific revolution different from the effects of the enlightenment?
The scientific revolution caused religious controversies, while the Enlightenment challenged absolute monarchy.
Which scientist is known for contributions to a scientific discipline that is different from that of the other three scientists?
Archimedes.
Why was Copernicus discovery called the Copernicus revolution?
It represented a change in scientific thought
What did nicolaus coperricopernicus and Galileo Galilee to the scientific revolution different?
Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galilei both played crucial roles in the Scientific Revolution, but they approached it differently. Copernicus proposed the heliocentric model, suggesting that the Earth revolves around the Sun, which fundamentally challenged the geocentric view. In contrast, Galileo utilized empirical observation and experimentation, famously using a telescope to provide evidence supporting Copernican theory and advocating for a scientific method based on observation. Together, their contributions helped shift the focus from philosophical speculation to evidence-based inquiry in science.
How did scientists before the scientific revolutiob do their work?
The same way, but with different tools and skills. If hadn't been for people experimenting there would have been no scientific revolution. The foundation of anything is based on the past.
How would things be different if Galileo didnt exist?
If Galileo had not existed, the advancement of modern science, particularly in physics and astronomy, would likely have been significantly delayed. His advocacy for the scientific method and empirical observation challenged prevailing geocentric beliefs and laid the groundwork for future scientists like Newton. The lack of his contributions might have hindered the acceptance of heliocentrism and the development of key concepts such as inertia and the laws of motion. Consequently, the Scientific Revolution could have taken a different trajectory, potentially prolonging the dominance of superstition and religious dogma in scientific inquiry.
If Galileo didn't exist would the world be different?
Yes, the world would likely be different without Galileo. His contributions to the fields of physics and astronomy helped to shape our modern understanding of the universe. Without his influence, scientific progress may have been delayed or taken a different trajectory.
