There are several problems here. They include . . .
-- This convoluted statement is not a question.
-- It begins with a nonsense hypothesis, and seems to build from there.
Zero is not everything and nothing at the same time. One is moved to
scream "What in Sam's Hill does thatmean?".
-- The "If ... then ..." format is written as "If ... than ...", seemingly in order
to throw any well meaning responders off the trail if they come too close.
-- The proposed conclusion that rests on the flawed hypothesis is so
grammatically convoluted that the reader finds himself correcting it as he
goes along, just to come up with a sentence to which he can respond.
Taken as a whole, it's enough to give the art of syllogism a bad name.
I'm pretty sure that IF there is an actual question here somewhere, then
the answer is "No".
No. More accurately, nothing in the universe is stationary. There is no single fixed reference point in the expanding universe, and all known astronomical objects are in motion with respect to one another.
The end of the universe means nothing will survive even the universe itself.
The universe was, as the science claimed, created from nothing which is called the singularity. The "nothing" was dipped in Higgs field and a mass then created. From the mass, the universe was created.
I, myself, am not sure, but one common theory is the big bang. so if you take Einsteins equation of E=MC squared, then you'd be able to backtrack by taking all the matter in the universe, and multiplying it by the speed of light squared, and thats how much energy there was. you can also flip the equation around, which is how everything was created from nothing.
Because it didn't rip the universe, obviously. The theory of black holes state that as a star collapses in on it's self all of it's matter is around the size of a baseball, all of the stars mass into that small of space rip's the very fabric of the universe forming a black hole. My question was if a black hole can rip the very fabric of the universe and it's only the mass of the star host then why did'nt the big bang if everything we have ever known or seen was the size of a baseball? Well, technically, the big bang has infinate mass, and since there was nothing really to compare it to, it was the size of everything, and nothing. If the big bang was a black hole, and if it ripped the universe, then the universe would have imploded upon itself before it was even created.
There is nothing beyond the universe because we say universe to whole thing/everything.
The universe is everything by definition. This means there is nothing outside of the universe. There is no noted end to the universe or line that someone could say this is where the universe ends and the outside begins.
The word "universe" means "all space, all time, and everything in them". It's the concept that includes everything, and bigger than which nothing is.
No. More accurately, nothing in the universe is stationary. There is no single fixed reference point in the expanding universe, and all known astronomical objects are in motion with respect to one another.
no, it is definitely not possible and therefore nothing to worry about when time travelling
As we all know, there is an end to everything. How it happens, none know, but nothing is Infinite. Nothing goes on forever. So I was wondering, what could be at the end of this Universe? Nothing can go on forever. And that is why I have begun thinking about this, as it is a bizarre question that may go unanswered for millions of years. So...what do you think, is at the edge of the Universe?
An open universe is one that does not have enough mass to slow down the expansion of the universe. This means that the universe will continue to expand indefinitely, with galaxies moving further and further apart from each other.
Impossible is nothing when .............Everything becomes Possible..Howz that??
i think that god is the cause of the universe because nothing happens by itself therefore everything needs a cause meaning that god id the cause of the universe. futhermore only god has the power/will to create the sophistacated universe .
The definition of "universe" is "everything". That includes the solar system Since the solar system is a part of the universe, and since there is other stuff in addition to the solar system, and since there is nothing more in addition to the universe, we can see that the universe is bigger than the solar system.
Nothing...or dark matter.Only 0.03% of our universe are the stars,the planets,the galaxies...99.97% of the universe is nothing...
The question has words which have what I would call (for want of knowledge of a better description) reflective meanings; The words 'nothing' and 'impossible' cannot stand on their own and owe their existence (valid or otherwise) to the words 'thing' and 'possible'. If it were true (as it must, in my opinion be) that all things are possible, it follows that nothing is impossible - but there is no validity in the examination of the validity of the statement 'nothing is impossible' - it simply follows from 'everything is possible'. There is no room to (validly) proceed. Says who? Says I! So are you God? Not yet! (remember I said everything is possible) - Have a good day!