No. He only came with the idea of a heliocentric model. (Sun-centred) He also stated that the Earth orbited around it.
Newton's work on orbits built upon Kepler's laws by providing a theoretical explanation for why planets follow elliptical paths around the Sun. Newton's laws of motion and law of universal gravitation helped to show that these elliptical orbits were a consequence of a gravitational force between the planets and the Sun, providing a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanics of planetary motion.
Copernicus provided a groundbreaking heliocentric model of the universe, shifting from the Earth-centric view to the Sun at the center of the solar system. His work laid the foundation for modern astronomy and greatly influenced scientific thought during the Scientific Revolution. Copernicus's contributions challenged traditional beliefs and paved the way for a more accurate understanding of the cosmos.
the idea behind rutherfords atomic theory is that the atom has a central positive nucleus and negatively charged electrons, which move in orbits, surround it. most of the atom is made up of empty space. he assumed this theory through a gold-foil experiment about which you can find information on the internet.
If everything is exactly the same (including Temperature, Purity of the Reagents, etc.) you will get the same results. This is called Experimental Reproducibility. BUT, I must add that, 'in theory, theory works.' Just 2 iterations of the experiment, is not enough to 'prove' a theory. Carefully analyze your results.
Kepler made discoveries regarding the planet's distance from the sun and how long it takes a planet to orbit the sun. In Newton's Version of Kepler's Third Law, Newton expands on these ideas by using his Theory of Gravity.
Kepler's work, particularly his three laws of planetary motion, revolutionized our understanding of the solar system by describing the orbits of planets around the sun with incredible accuracy. His laws provided a mathematical framework that moved away from the Earth-centered model, paving the way for the adoption of the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus. Kepler's contributions laid the foundation for Newton to later develop his laws of gravitation, solidifying the modern understanding of the solar system.
No. He only came with the idea of a heliocentric model. (Sun-centred) He also stated that the Earth orbited around it.
Cost-plus-markup theory is the theory that business firms calculate their unit costs and add on a percentage markup.
Self-orientation
Newton's work on orbits built upon Kepler's laws by providing a theoretical explanation for why planets follow elliptical paths around the Sun. Newton's laws of motion and law of universal gravitation helped to show that these elliptical orbits were a consequence of a gravitational force between the planets and the Sun, providing a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanics of planetary motion.
It is a theory that Earth came in a big boom out of nowhere. It's not a true story because there is a Creator.
To figure out formulas and equations and claculations to prove or add evidence to a theory.
Copernicus provided a groundbreaking heliocentric model of the universe, shifting from the Earth-centric view to the Sun at the center of the solar system. His work laid the foundation for modern astronomy and greatly influenced scientific thought during the Scientific Revolution. Copernicus's contributions challenged traditional beliefs and paved the way for a more accurate understanding of the cosmos.
Newton derived Keplars findings from Newton's Theory of Gravity. Thus, newton 'explained' the basis for Keplars findings and extended them.
Theories tend to Remain a Pseudo Fact, until proven otherwise, the theorist, is under no obligation to Prove his Theory, which makes anyone capable of writing a Theory, without using any Facts whatsoever. Of course it's always advisable to throw a few facts around within the Theory, to add some Credibility to your Theory. Remember if you could prove a theory as Fact, then it would no longer be a Theory, but a Fact.
Yes it can be proven because remember a hypothesis is an educated guess so u can add evidence to and a theory is somewhere between a guess and an educated guess. So yes they both can