Neither is necessarily more precise; something could be exactly 19mm or exactly 2cm. However it can definitely be said that measuring to the nearest mm is more precise than measuring to the nearest cm. This is because a mm is smaller and so if any rounding is involved (to the nearest mm or cm) then the rounding is less of a distance and the error in absolute precision is therefore less.
19 mm is more precise than 2 cm because it is a smaller unit of measurement. There are 10 mm in 1 cm, so 19 mm is more specific than 2 cm.
The cost of a 2cm garnet can vary depending on the quality, color, clarity, and origin of the stone. On average, a 2cm garnet can range from $20 to $100 per carat, but prices can go higher for more rare or high-quality stones.
To convert 19mm to centimeters, you divide by 10 since there are 10 millimeters in 1 centimeter. Therefore, 19mm is equal to 1.9 centimeters.
612 m is more precise.
Divide it by 25.4
19mm is more precise. 19mm = 1.9cm
19 mm is more precise than 2 cm because it is a smaller unit of measurement. There are 10 mm in 1 cm, so 19 mm is more specific than 2 cm.
2cm
19mm
The smallest centimetre is 2cm because 342cm is 340 spaces more than 2cm
Ah, what a lovely question! To find the volume of a cube, you simply need to cube the length of one side. So, if the side of the cube is 2 cm, you would calculate 2 cm x 2 cm x 2 cm, which equals 8 cubic centimeters. Isn't that just a happy little calculation?
Volume = 2cm x 2 cm x 2 cm = 8 cm^(3).
19mm is 0.019 meters.
cups is less precise.
20 21/32 is more precise.20 21/32 is more precise.20 21/32 is more precise.20 21/32 is more precise.
Ounces are more precise.
It is 8 cubic cm.