Neither is necessarily more precise; something could be exactly 19mm or exactly 2cm. However it can definitely be said that measuring to the nearest mm is more precise than measuring to the nearest cm. This is because a mm is smaller and so if any rounding is involved (to the nearest mm or cm) then the rounding is less of a distance and the error in absolute precision is therefore less.
19 mm is more precise than 2 cm because it is a smaller unit of measurement. There are 10 mm in 1 cm, so 19 mm is more specific than 2 cm.
The cost of a 2cm garnet can vary depending on the quality, color, clarity, and origin of the stone. On average, a 2cm garnet can range from $20 to $100 per carat, but prices can go higher for more rare or high-quality stones.
To convert millimetres to centimetres you divide by 10.
Divide it by 25.4
2cm
19mm is more precise. 19mm = 1.9cm
19 mm is more precise than 2 cm because it is a smaller unit of measurement. There are 10 mm in 1 cm, so 19 mm is more specific than 2 cm.
2cm
19mm
The smallest centimetre is 2cm because 342cm is 340 spaces more than 2cm
Volume = 2cm x 2 cm x 2 cm = 8 cm^(3).
19mm is 0.019 meters.
Oh, dude, it's like you're trying to make me do math here. Alright, so the volume of a cube is just the length of one side cubed. In this case, it's 2cm x 2cm x 2cm, which equals 8 cubic centimeters. So, yeah, that's the volume of your little cube.
The volume of a cube is calculated by multiplying the length, width, and height of the cube. In this case, all sides of the cube are 2cm. Therefore, the volume of the cube would be 2cm x 2cm x 2cm = 8 cubic centimeters.
The answer will depend on what the tube is made from and how thick its walls are.
The cost of a 2cm garnet can vary depending on the quality, color, clarity, and origin of the stone. On average, a 2cm garnet can range from $20 to $100 per carat, but prices can go higher for more rare or high-quality stones.
2cm by 2cm