In case of 1s order Splitting above answer is correct. in case of Non-1st Order splitting we should follow the following example
let for AMX(Quartet)
take our hand fingers for spectrum explanation(vomit thumb finger), distance between little finger to middle finger let it 'X' minus distance between showing finger and side finger of little finger let it 'y'.
Now the coupling constant is (X-Y)/2.
Kindly suggest if any mistake or difficulty to understand.
In NMR spectroscopy, a coupling constant is a measure of the interaction between different nuclear spins in a molecule. It provides information about the connectivity and relative arrangement of atoms in a molecule. The value of the coupling constant is influenced by the number of bonds and the dihedral angle between the coupled nuclei.
No, it is not true.
Yes this is true
Kinematics does not require constant acceleration. There are different equations for different situations. So some of the equations will be valid even when the acceleration is not constant.
It is something that is proven as true and indisputable.
At constant pressure the temperature and the volume of a gas are directly related; this the Charle Law.
A constant that multiplies a variable is no longer a constant. By its very definition, a constant is something that can never be different. The result of variable multiplication is thus a variable, not a constant.I would say that the above answer is not necessarily true. The common equation for the area of a circle is: area = pi * r2The fact that you are multiplying the mathematical constant pi by a variable does not change the value of pi.Agree with the second answer. Jsut to add, a constant that multplies a variable is called a coefficient.
independent variable
Yes they are true in a Dictionary.
true!
No, it is not true.
If velocity is constant, the true acceleration is zero. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, so if velocity is not changing, the acceleration is also zero.
True.
No, the opposite of a definition is certainly not always true. That would depend on the definitions and the meaning of the opposite.
TRUE
Yes this is true
This is true by definition.
a pig