0
The earth is flat, when it is actually round,,,,. flat can also be round lay a coin flat and it can be round. the spinning oblate spheroid model is badly flawed under natural laws within science and psychics. fluid dynamics will explain. uncontained water will flow and seek level. bodies of contained water undisturbed will have a level surface. bodies of water could never stick uncontained to the exterior of a spinning oblate spheroid. there is no observable measurable curve to be measured according to the 8"per mile squared, fish eye lenses on go pro cameras can give this impression but have been proven wrong.
Newton's Laws of motion is also flawed dayton miller interferometer experiments proved motionless plane
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ross
Rafa
BlakeSome scientific laws that have been proven wrong or revised include the luminiferous aether theory, which was believed to be the medium through which light waves traveled but was later debunked by the theory of relativity. Another example is the geocentric model of the universe, which was replaced by the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus. Additionally, Newton's laws of motion were updated by Einstein's theory of relativity to better describe motion at high speeds or in strong gravitational fields.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why aren't the big bang theory and the steady state theory considered scientific laws?
They can't be proven with 100% scientific certainty. No one was there to witness the big bang, so we can't technically say that it definitely happened. And we wouldn't call the Steady State Theory a law, since it has been seriously discounted in recent decades. It is worth adding that when time honored theories become 'laws' it is not because they have be proven with 100% certainty. It is because they have survived the test of time and the test of many, many scientific challenges. Nothing can really be proven with 100% scientific certainty.
What is the comparison between scientific law and scientific theory?
A scientific law describes a consistent pattern or relationship in nature that has been observed and confirmed through experimentation. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has withstood multiple tests and scrutiny. The main difference is that a law describes what happens, while a theory explains why it happens.
Why have the laws of physic not been rewritten?
The laws of physics have not been rewritten because they accurately describe and predict the behavior of the natural world. These laws have stood the test of time through rigorous testing and experimentation. Any new discoveries are incorporated into existing frameworks rather than completely rewriting them.
In the scientific theory what can you think of as a rule of nature?
In scientific theory, a rule of nature is a fundamental principle that describes how the natural world behaves consistently under certain conditions. These rules are based on observations, experimentation, and mathematical models that help explain and predict natural phenomena. Examples of rules of nature include Newton's laws of motion, the law of gravity, and the laws of thermodynamics.
How was Aristotle's dynamic motion theory proven wrong?
Aristotle's dynamic motion theory was proven wrong with the advancements in physics and the development of Newton's laws of motion. Newton's laws provided a more accurate description of how objects move and interact with each other, which contradicted Aristotle's ideas about motion and force. Additionally, the observations and experiments of scientists like Galileo further disproved Aristotle's theories on motion.
