Both Luis Suarez and Diego Forlan are talented Uruguayan soccer players with different playing styles. Suarez is known for his goal-scoring prowess and physicality, while Forlan was a skillful and technically gifted forward. It ultimately depends on personal preference and the specific criteria being used to determine who is "better."
Comparing Suarez and Ronaldo is subjective as they excel in different aspects of the game. Ronaldo is known for his athleticism, goal-scoring prowess, and ability to lead a team, while Suarez is praised for his technical skills, finishing ability, and intelligent movement off the ball. Ultimately, both players are world-class in their own right.
Antsiranana, also known as Diego Suarez, is located on the northern coast of Madagascar.
Blitzle is way better
Those who pass their exam are better..
better workingout in the morning
Impossible to answer. Forlan can make shots hit the upper 90 from half field, but Suarez is a great finisher. My opinion is that Forlan is a better all around player, especially taken in context of his winning the golden ball during WC 2010.
Luis suarez, Diego Forlan, Sebastian Abreu
Yes There are famous footballers such as Diego Forlan and Luis Suarez
im not sure but i think that they met when they played for uraguay together
none its me
Two most famous players from Uruguay today are dingo Forlan and Luis Suarez.
Luis suarez is way better than tatti Torres
gerrard is a liverpool legand suarez is not so it is gerrard
torres
Luis Suarez is better because he has scored more goals, done overall better, and Carroll was hurt when Liverpool FC bought him.
David Villa (Spain) Miroslav Klose (Germany) Thomas Muller (Germany) Wesley Sneijder (Netherlands) Diego Forlan (Uruguay) Luis Suarez (Uruguay)
This is a matter of opinion