The comparison between The Undertaker and Bruno Sammartino often comes down to personal preference and the era in which each wrestler performed. Bruno Sammartino is celebrated for his lengthy title reigns and his role in popularizing professional Wrestling in the 1960s and 70s. The Undertaker, on the other hand, is known for his unique character, longevity, and iconic matches, particularly at WrestleMania. Ultimately, both are legends in their own right, each having made significant contributions to the sport.
It was Bruno because his father nick named him that
how old is Bruno mars
Bruno Mars DOES NOT have a son. It is all purely rumours :L
Bruno Mars live in LA, California but he was born in Hawaii...
10
Bruno Sammartino is 79 years old.
undertaker is better santio
ROCK!!!!!undertaker is kk but that rock owns him. NO, the undertaker is way better.
Undertaker
it is said the undertaker is better but to be honest i think HBK is 10x better
Bigshow is better than Kane
undertaker all the way.
Triple H is way better because he has beet the undertaker like 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 times! When has Triple H ever beaten the Undertaker? The Undertaker is better than Triple H. UNDERTAKER IS WAY BETTER! HE IS WWE'S BIGGEST THREAT NOW THAT UMAGA DIED!
Undertaker is better because he beat Randy Orton at Wrestlemania 21
I like undertaker more so i will tell that undertaker is better if you like Jeff hardy more than you will say Jeff is better. So, its better to keep your own opinion.
undertaker.. althought both basically have the same moves undertaker tends to modify his movesbased on his opponent better than kane.
Khali is stronger than Undertaker. Undertaker is a Batka. He is padela. He is unfit to fight