90
42
Divided by, is like saying how many groups are there. E.g. 24 divided by 4 = how many groups of 4 are there in 24, so a smaller number would equal more groups to fit into the larger number.
Yes. It can be divided into -- 21 equal groups of 1 each -- 3 equal groups of 7 each -- 7 equal groups of 3 each
16 by 2,4 by 8.
434
42
8 less than the number of apples divided into 5 groups = 1.6
Divided by, is like saying how many groups are there. E.g. 24 divided by 4 = how many groups of 4 are there in 24, so a smaller number would equal more groups to fit into the larger number.
24 is the number that can be divided equally by 3 and 8
Yes. It can be divided into -- 21 equal groups of 1 each -- 3 equal groups of 7 each -- 7 equal groups of 3 each
42 because 24 divided by 7 = 6
Yes it is =)
If you have 42 treaties they can be divided into 6 groups with 7 treaties in each group or 7 groups with 6 in each. No smaller number of treaties can be divided into groups of 6 or 7.
2 groups of 16, 4 groups of 8, 8 groups of 4, 16 groups of 2. Not really divided or in groups, but there could be 1 group of 32 or everyone by themselves.
This is just an arbitrary convention, based perhaps on the fact that each 'even' number can be divided into equal portions. The 'odd' numbers are not curious in any manner other than they can be only be divided into equal groups of 'odd' numbers. e.g. 15 may be divided into 5 groups of 3. BUT 7 cannot be divided into an equal number of groups.
It is impossible to have 9.8 children!
16 by 2,4 by 8.