Simply that if the doer accidentally does a good deed while intending either something foul or even something of neutral moral value, then that act cannot be said to have been done with great moral principles. Conversely, if the doer mistakenlycommits a morally questionable faux pas then that act should not be taken as proof of a doubtful morality in the doer. (Although it could be used as an argument for the stupidity or cupidity of the doer!)
False- The content of a message can appeal to consumers in a number of different ways-rationally, emotionally, and morally. Rational appeal focuses on how the product can benefit the user, or how it is in his or her self-interest to buy it. Emotional appeal uses feelings to motivate customers to buy. A moral appeal is directed at a person's sense of ethics.
It means the same thing as if you were to replace "you have no room to talk" with "you are in no better position to comment on the subject," Because you are in the same position as the other person; or have the same faults; or have comitted the same act as the other person, it is often seen as morally unjust to place blame on them. If another person has mud on thier pants and they are making fun of you because you have mud on your pants, they have no room to talk. If you cheated on your boyfriend and are getting mad at him for checking out other girls, you have no room to talk.
BIG NO!! It is absolutely not "okay" for a student to trade sexual favors for a good grade. The student who provided the sexual favors needs to find a way to have more respect for him or herself and perhaps even study and learn the material for whatever grade they get, or choose not to study and fail the class. The teacher should be reported, fired, and charged with whatever crimes have been committed. Not only is it morally wrong, in many states it is illegal, regardless of the ages of the student and teacher. Because of the special relationship it is considered very wrong.
Never
Immanuel Kant would argue that lying undermines the rational consistency of moral principles. He would evaluate a lying promise as morally wrong because it contradicts the categorical imperative, which states that one should always act according to principles that could be universal laws. Kant would consider lying to be irrational because it would not be acceptable for everyone to make lying promises.
As with many things, it depends what you do and for what purpose.
It is morally correct to resist the actions of an immoral government by whatever means are necessary.
In philosophy and theology we speak of "human acts". Since human beings have an intellect and will, the main faculties of the soul, all acts are are human acts. This is because every act we do is done with intention, either implicit or explicit and thus is a human act. Acts that we do while the will is suspended or forced or damaged, such as cases were we might be sleeping, tortured and under extreme duress or inebriated or psychologically affected, are not human acts. Any act that is done in line with the natural law, observing the laws of God and with a good intention would be a moral act, as in morally correct. Any action that is done in defiance of the natural law, or laws of God, or is poisoned with a bad intention, is an immoral act, and is morally wrong. Often, it depends on circumstances and intention as to whether an act is moral. For instance, if you kill someone, this is obviously a morally evil act, however, if it is done in self defense, this act is morally correct. Moral theology is the study that is solely considered with human acts and the circumstances and intentions that affect them. Catholic priests must study moral theology during their seminary studies, specifically as part of their training to correct administer and advise souls in the sacrament of confession. Therefore, to specifically address the question, any act for it to be morally right must be a human act, so indeed, any right act is a moral act by definition.
Human acts can be classified as either morally good (virtuous) or morally evil (sinful) based on the intention behind them, the circumstances surrounding them, and the moral object or action itself. Additionally, human acts can be classified as deliberate or involuntary depending on the level of intention and control involved in performing the action.
What in the situation is morally right or wrong, or more simply good and bad, about the situation in the context of the human experience.
Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.
It is considered a crime throughout the world. That pretty much makes it a bad idea. And major religions consider it morally repugnant. YESS!!!!!
The three elements of a moral decision are: 1) Object 2) Intention 3) Circumstances For an act to be morally good, the object, intention, and circumstances must be good.
Being morally blind refers to the inability or unwillingness to perceive or understand ethical issues or make morally sound decisions. It can result from a lack of empathy, disregard for ethical norms, or a failure to consider the impact of one's actions on others.
"Good" and "evil" do not exist. Some shape-shifters do things that people would consider morally wrong, but most don't. No, are you evil?