If two or more factors are relatively prime, then they only have 1 as a common factor. Take 7 and 9 for example. The factors of 7 are 1 and 7 The factors of 9 are 1, 3, and 9
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
In order to answer a question about relative primeness, you need to talk about two or more numbers. The question only asked about 1. Please restate the question.7 is relatively prime to all the integers which can not be divide by 7.
Two numbers which are "relatively prime" have no common prime factors. To illustrate, let's write several numbers in terms of their prime factors: 24 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 25 = 5 x 5 42 = 2 x 3 x 7 70 = 2 x 5 x 7 You can see that 24 and 25 are relatively prime, because they don't share any common prime factors. Likewise, 25 and 42 are relatively prime. 24 and 42, however, are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factors of 2 and 3. Likewise 25 and 70 are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factor 5. When a fraction is in its simplest form, the numerator and denominator are relatively prime.
22 is not relatively prime
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, 7 and 14 are not relatively prime. They share the factor 7.
13 and 4 are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, 4 and 15 are relatively prime.
Yes, 4 and 21 are relatively prime. Numbers that are relatively prime only have the number 1 as a common factor. That is the case with 4 and 21.
No, 56 is not prime.
Two numbers are considered relatively prime if their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.
126 and 49 are not relatively prime because they have 7 as a common prime factor.
No, 14 and 21 are not relatively prime. They share the factor 7.No.