0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Jordan
Taiga
LaoAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What kinds of numbers would I multiply by to get answers that are slightly less than my starting number A lot less?
NO for Integers NO for Real Numbers proof 1 * any integer is not bigger than that integer nor is 0 * any integer. proof for Real Numbers is easier any real < 1 * any real > 0 is not larger than the second Real for example .5 * 1 = .5 is less than 1 or .5 * 2 = 1 less than 2 or .5 * = 1 less than 2 or -1 *3 = -3 less than 3 so all fractions times a positive Real is less than that positive Real All negative numbers times a positive Real is less than that positive Real and 0 or 1 times all positive Reals is also less than that positive Real NO NO NO is the answer
What is the mathematical proof of the reflexive property of equality?
The reflexive property of equality states that any number is equal to itself. This property has no proof, as it is the fundamental building-block of all other proofs.
What is the number or expression in a power that is mutipled by itself?
Let a be any term. Then, the number that is multiplied itself is expressed as: an where a is any real value, and n is any real integer.
Is nsinn properly divergent?
No. The sequence (n*sin(n)) is not properly divergent. To be properly divergent it must either "tend to" +inf or -inf. We say that (xn) tends to +inf if for every real number a there exists a natural number N such that if n>=N, then xn>a. It is clear that no such N exists for all real numbers because n*sin(n) oscillates (because of the sin(n)). Therefore (n*sin(n)) is not properly divergent. This is not a rigorous proof but the definition of proper divergence is precise and can be used for any proof dealing with proper divergence.
What is the value of 2002 Mississippi state quarter?
....25 cents just like any other post-1965 non-proof quarter. State quarters are not rare or valuable unless they are proof or have some error.
