1 pair of 2 angles
Congruent
Opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent.
quadrilaterals are consecutive and opposite angles always congruent?
A polygon with 2n sides (n>1) can have opposite angles congruent.
It depends on the kite but on most they are
Only the two angles which are connected by the shorter diagonal will be congruent. The other two angles will not necessarily be congruent.
It has one pair.
The top and bottom angles - the angles that are between the pairs of congruent sides. They are opposite each other and not necessarily congruent.
One pair of opposite angles are equal in a kite and its 4 interior angles add up to 360 degrees.
A kite is similar to a parallelogram in that both have opposite pairs of congruent sides. However, unlike a parallelogram, a kite does not have congruent opposite angles. Additionally, a kite has two pairs of adjacent sides that are congruent, while a parallelogram has all sides congruent.
Both are quadrilaterals. Both have two pairs of side of equal length. In a kite they are adjacent sides, in a rectangle they are opposite. A kite has one pair of equal angles, all of a rectangle's angles are equal. In a kite, one diagonals bisects the other, in a rectangle both do.
A square has 4 congruent sides and 4 right angles, in addition to having all of the properties of a parallelogram. A kite is not a parallelogram. It has two pairs of consecutive congruent sides, and a pair of congruent opposite angles.
The nonvertex angles of kite are congruent, and are the two angles that appear closer together.
Yes, a kite typically has at least one obtuse angle. A kite is a quadrilateral with two distinct pairs of consecutive, congruent sides. In a kite, the angles between the non-congruent sides (the angles opposite the longer and shorter sides) are usually not congruent. One of these angles can be obtuse, depending on the specific shape of the kite. However, it's important to note that a kite can also have acute angles, but it must have at least one obtuse angle.
the opposite angles are congruent
No they are not.