No. They cannot equal 180 degrees unless the kite is square.
The kite shape (aka deltoid) is a special case: a bisymmetrical trapezoid with one pair of angles (the sides) equal, and the others not equal (top, bottom). There are two pairs of adjacent equilateral sides.
Yes. The opposite angles of a kite can be supplementary if the kite is, more specifically, a square. (90° + 90° = 180°)
The top and bottom of a kite will never be equal (unless it is a square)but the left and right angles of the kite will be.
Are opposite angles. There is nothing in the question that would require them to be equal or supplementary or anything.
Allied (or co-interior) angles are supplementary. Vertically opposite angles are always equal.
Yes.
Yes. The opposite angles of a kite can be supplementary if the kite is, more specifically, a square. (90° + 90° = 180°)
no * * * * * But they can be.
Yes, two opposite angles of a kite can be acute, as kites have two pairs of equal adjacent angles, and both pairs can be acute. 2) No, opposite angles of a kite cannot be supplementary since the sum of the angles in any quadrilateral is 360 degrees, and opposite angles in a kite are not supplementary. 3) Yes, two opposite angles of a kite can be complementary, as long as their measures add up to 90 degrees.
Yes, they can. An example of this is when a kite's opposite angles are both 90°. (90° + 90° = 180°) In the example, the kite is more specifically a square, but because of the Quadrilateral Hierarchy Theorem, this is possible.
no
No, it does not.
No No, they are comp
No. The adjacent angles are supplementary.
No, they are equal. Adjacent angles are supplementary in a prallelogram.
No, they are generally not supplementary.
Yes, adjacent angles are supplementary; however, opposite angles are not.
No. A kite has four angles so that makes 2 pairs of opposite angles.