In any large range of numbers, more so the higher and larger the range is, there will be more composites than primes. It is far more likely that a given number will be divisible by some number less than the number itself, the higher you go.
The largest integer that is not the product of two or more different primes would be the largest prime number. Because there are an infinite number of prime numbers, there is no largest integer that is not the product of two or more different primes.
301
tracks per inch
101
20 as a product of primes = 2 * 2 * 5
The products of the primes are the composites.
It is 2:7
it is a brute force way to find all the primes in a given range. Remove all the composites, and you are left with the primes
primes are 1,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,91. all others are composites.
Number of primes = 4 Number of composites = 5 Ratio of primes to composites = 4 : 5
YES, though i'm not positive.
4 to 15 exclusive 4 to 17 inclusive
4 to 15 exclusive 4 to 17 inclusive
The Sieve of Eratosthenes filters numbers, letting the composites fall through while the primes remain.
Actually both are important. Public encryption is based on the product (and so a composite) of two very large prime numbers.
There is no general rule. There is no general rule for primes in any interval and, by extension, there is none for composites.
4 to 15 exclusive 4 to 17 inclusive