1.25 IS a rational number. The fact that it is expressed as a decimal does not mean it is not rational. As a ratio, it can be written as 125/100. You may simplify that ratio if you so wish
8.98 IS a rational number. The fact that it is expressed as a decimal does not mean it is not rational. As a ratio, it can be written as 898/100. You may simplify that ratio if you so wish
Any number which can be written exactly with a limited set of figures is "rational". Numbers which cannot be written with a limited set, because the decimal number goes on for ever is "irrational". So 1.4 is rational because it takes only 2 figures to write its value exactly.
Yes because it can be expressed as a fraction
an irrarional number is a number that can't be written as a fraction or whole number. -sqrt(9)=-3 This is a whole number so it isn't irrational, just rational
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
All whole numbers (integers) are rational because they can be written as the number over 1. 1 = 1/1 so it can be written as a fraction so is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
-- Any number that can be written as the ratio of two whole numbers is a rational number.-- Any whole number can be written as the ratio of that number to ' 1 ', so it's rational.
A rational number is any number that can be written as a fraction. 2 can be written as (2/10 or (4/2) or (10/5) and so on, so it is a rational number.◄ An example of a number than cannot is √2 or (pi), so are called irrational.