102 + 32 = 100 + 9 =109 (not an even number)
8 divided by 2 does not equal 2 divided by 8. 8/2=4...2/8=0.25
4 is divisible by 2 but not by 6
Well, honey, the statement that division of a whole number is associative is as false as claiming you can wear a swimsuit in a blizzard. Just take the numbers 10, 5, and 2 for example. (10 ÷ 5) ÷ 2 is not the same as 10 ÷ (5 ÷ 2). So, there you have it - a sassy counterexample for you!
Sum of squares? Product?
u cant get the excat answer but if you want 1) To find imperfect squares you estimate the square to the nearest integer 85 2) This is an imperfect square because no whole number multiplies itself to equal 85 you find the closest square but less than the imperfect squares answer 9*9=81 4) Now you find a square that is closest higher than the imperfect squares answer 10*10=100 5) So 85 lays between 9 and 10
find a counterexample to the statement all us presidents have served only one term to show statement is false
Find one counterexample to negate the statement
to find a counterexample
To disprove this all you need to do if find one example of a prime that is not even. Such an example is called a counterexample. If a statement that all such and such or every such and such has a certain property, all you have to do to disprove it it to demonstrate the existence of on such and such that lacks the property .
One way to show that a statement is not a good definition is to find a counterexample, which is an instance that does not fit the definition provided. By demonstrating that the definition does not cover all possible cases or includes cases that should not be included, its inadequacy can be revealed.
You are an Idiot dude. there is no such value
8 divided by 2 does not equal 2 divided by 8. 8/2=4...2/8=0.25
count the top row of squares and multiply that by the number of squares in a coloumn ( which are going down )
4 is divisible by 2 but not by 6
In the classic puzzle with squares of differeing sizes within squares, the number is 40.Its a popular net puzzle.
Well, honey, the statement that division of a whole number is associative is as false as claiming you can wear a swimsuit in a blizzard. Just take the numbers 10, 5, and 2 for example. (10 ÷ 5) ÷ 2 is not the same as 10 ÷ (5 ÷ 2). So, there you have it - a sassy counterexample for you!
4 divides 4 (once), but 4 is not divisible by 8. ■