D
Estimated is like taking a guess as to what the answer would be. Example: 597 + 635 estimated 600 + 600 = estimated guess 1200 with the correct answer being 597 + 635 = 1232 For estimated 345 it could be estimated at 300 or 400
the estimated digit in 0.0782m is?
Because if you have none, there is no point in doing the experiment. If you have more than one you will have interactions between the independent variables but, with a good experimental design, these can be estimated so there is no reason to use independent variables one at a time.
The last digit is always the estimated digit in a number
None of the digits need be estimated.
A theory is based on a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an estimated or intelligent guess about the outcome of an experiment. A theory is based on what happens during the experiment.
No, not at all. It is estimated at approximately 10% of the population is Gay.
Experimental or empirical probability is estimated from repeated trials of an experiment. However, instead of actually carrying out the experiment a very large number of times, it may be possible to simulate them.
Line graphs are powerful tools because they help you to estimate values for conditions that you did not test in the experiment. mostly estimated related values are related with line graphs
The estimated melting point of fermium is 1 627 0C; other physical properties are not known.
It means that the probability is calculated (or more precisely, estimated) based on experiment. For example, if a certain event occurs 70 times in 1000 tries, you can estimate the probability to be approximately 7%.
One way of finding the probability is to carry out an experiment repeatedly. Then the estimated experimental probability is the proportion of the total number of repeated trials in which the desired outcome occurs.Suppose, for example you have a loaded die and want to find the probability of rolling a six. You roll it again and again keeping a count of the total number of rolls (n) and the number of rolls which resulted in a six, x. The estimated experimental probability of rolling a six is x/n.
56 is estimated to be 60.
Estimated is like taking a guess as to what the answer would be. Example: 597 + 635 estimated 600 + 600 = estimated guess 1200 with the correct answer being 597 + 635 = 1232 For estimated 345 it could be estimated at 300 or 400
That is simply not true.There are times when a number of factors can have an effect on the outcome of an experiment but it is not possible to conduct the experiment so that only one factor is allowed to vary while all others are controlled. It is far more efficient - in terms of experimental units - to design the experiment so that the interactions between variable factors can be estimated. Experimental design is the subject that deals with the problem of designing efficient schema for dealing with a number of interacting factors. You may wish to look at "Latin square design" and "Greco-Latin squares" as an introduction to design.
'Estimated to be' is more commonly used. In a different situation you could use 'estimated as', it is not entirely grammatically incorrect. For example, "that ski jump is estimated as the highest recorded ski jump in history."
It is simplest if only one variable is changed at a time, but that requires more experiments or a larger sample. That may not always be possible.However, if more two or more variables are changed at a time, it is important that the experiment is well designed so that their interaction is either nullified or can be estimated.