Despite the treatments you see in many sources, they are NOT, unless you are converting and exponential measurement into a Log. Transposing degrees Celsius to degrees F is often used as an example, but that is a misuse of the term "inverse", which is actually a cancellation of a function. A good example of an inverse function is the Log function X=10Y, the inverse of Y=10X.
A common function transposed to the other variable is a reversal, transpose, or converse. Many object to "converse", since that usually means "if p = q, then q = p"; but that's what a transposed equation is. Teachers will give you a hard time on the converse-inverse issue, since it has infected many textbooks. Go the the Mathematica site, or a good college precalculus book. See related link.
Division by a number is the inverse operation to multiplication by the number (and vice versa).
1 kilometer are 1093.6133 yards. Scroll down to related links and look at "Conversions of length (distance) units".
Apex: false A logarithmic function is not the same as an exponential function, but they are closely related. Logarithmic functions are the inverses of their respective exponential functions. For the function y=ln(x), its inverse is x=ey For the function y=log3(x), its inverse is x=3y For the function y=4x, its inverse is x=log4(y) For the function y=ln(x-2), its inverse is x=ey+2 By using the properties of logarithms, especially the fact that a number raised to a logarithm of base itself equals the argument of the logarithm: aloga(b)=b you can see that an exponential function with x as the independent variable of the form y=f(x) can be transformed into a function with y as the independent variable, x=f(y), by making it a logarithmic function. For a generalization: y=ax transforms to x=loga(y) and vice-versa Graphically, the logarithmic function is the corresponding exponential function reflected by the line y = x.
The function sec(x) is the secant function. It is related to the other functions by the expression 1/cos(x). It is not the inverse cosine or arccosine, it is one over the cosine function. Ex. cos(pi/4)= sqrt(2)/2 therefore secant is sec(pi/4)= 1/sqrt(2)/2 or 2/sqrt(2).
They both are constant and they also have a specific domain of the natural number.
they are inverse functions
One is the inverse of the other, just like the arc-sine is the inverse of the sine, or division is the inverse of multiplication.
Addition and subtraction are inverse functions.
No. The inverse of the secant is called the arc-secant. The relation between the secant and the cosecant is similar to the relation between the sine and the cosine - they are somehow related, but they are not inverse functions. The secant is the reciprocal of the cosine (sec x = 1 / cos x). The cosecant is the reciprocal of the sine (cos x = 1 / sin x).
Because multiplying is the inverse of dividing
Multiplication is the inverse operation to division.
Subtraction is the inverse operation to addition. Multiplication is repeated addition.Division is the inverse of multiplication.
2
As with all noise makers, it depents on the distance of the measurement of the sound pressure level. Scroll down to related links and look at "Sound pressure and the inverse distance law 1/r".
The hyperbolic functions are related to a hyperbola is the same way the the circular functions are related to a circle. So, while the points with coordinates [cos(t), sin(t)] generate the unit circle, their hyperbolic counterparts, [cosh(t) , sinh(t)] generate the right half of the equilateral hyperbola. Other circular functions (tan, sec, cosec and cot) also have their hyperbolic counterparts, as do the inverse functions. An alternative, equivalent pair of definitions is: cosh(x) = (ex + e-x)/2 and sinh(x) = (ex - e-x)/2
If an identity matrix is the answer to a problem under matrix multiplication, then each of the two matrices is an inverse matrix of the other.
Division by a number is the inverse operation to multiplication by the number (and vice versa).