its actually really possible, you can do it two ways:
_________
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
_________
i am not able show this on the computer but start from the two bottom edges
and go up to a point like a triange in the middle. that will make three triangles inside the square.
another way:
___________
___________
___________
this is a simpler way and the most equal. make three lines across the square equally.
Divide each side into three equal parts. Then join the division marks on opposite sides with straight lines parallel to the other side(s).
Grind the heart up in a blender and divide it out in three separate portions based off weight
No, because a heart only has one line of symmetry.
Take any side and divide it in three. Do the same to the opposite side. Join these division points to make three equal strips.
This provided illustration (below) might not be terribly accurate but the three equal parts are meant to be the shapes of three rhombus'. All three lines join up in the center of the hexagon.______/ \ \/ \ \/ \____\ Hexagon divided into 3 equal rhombuses.\ / /\ / /\ /____/
Draw 2 parallel lines which will result in 3 equal rectangles within the same square.
Divide 3 inches in 5 equal parts
Divide each side into three equal parts. Then join the division marks on opposite sides with straight lines parallel to the other side(s).
Impossible
three
1/3, divide the whole into 3
no there is no way to correctly divide a triangle into three equal parts. One side will always turn out an inch or so larger.
Grind the heart up in a blender and divide it out in three separate portions based off weight
Dividing 57 into three equal parts is the same as saying 57 / 3, which is equal to 19.
Yes, use a triplet.
No, because a heart only has one line of symmetry.
6