How about: 2*(1+3+4) = 16
There is only one number that equals 16. That number is 16.
9 + 7 = 16
65,535
only 1 can
How about: 2*(1+3+4) = 16
With repeats: 4×4 = 16; Without repeats: 4×3 = 12.
4*(3+2-1) = 4*4 = 16
16
The factors of 16 are 1,2,4,8 & 16. A prime number is only divisible by itself and 1. Therefore the only prime number is 2.
In a programming sense or a mathematical sense? Mathematically, it is the same method as used to convert between any number bases: Divide the number by the new base and note the remainder. Repeat with the quotient until it is zero. The number in the new base is the remainders in reverse order. For example, to convert the number 1234 in decimal (base 10) to hexadecimal (base 16): 1234 / 16 = 77 r2 77 / 16 = 4 r13 4 / 16 = 0 r 4 Number bases less than 10 use the same decimal digits, eg octal numbers (base 8) use the digits 0-7. For bases greater than 10, the convention is to use the alphabet to represent the extra digits, so base 11 would use 0-9,A, base 12 0-9, A-B, base 16 0-9, A-F, etc (where A would represent 1010, B represent 1110, etc). so 123410 = 4D216. Programmingwise, it would depend up on how your input number is stored, along with the language you're using. In C, for example, if you have an int containing number, it is actually effectively stored in binary and when printing it (converting to a string) it is converted to whatever the printf specification requests: printf("%d = 0x%x", 1234, 1234); would display 1234 = 0x4d2 The same specifications can be used on sprintf to store the result in memory. If you are required to write the conversion, program the algorithm described in the mathematical method.
There is only one number that equals 16. That number is 16.
Small words make a difference. No prime number "has" a factor of 16. But 2 is the only prime number that "is" a factor of 16.
No, 16 is not the only square number that's a multiple of 4.
16 is the only number that satisfies these conditions.
9 + 7 = 16
16 8,2 4,2,2 2,2,2,2