answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

961.62

Some people advise you to round up 0.5. Others say round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:

In the first case

If the number is 0.0 you don't need to round

If the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round down

If the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round up

So 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).

Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.

In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.

Possible solution:

Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.

Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you round 961.625 to two decimal places?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp