Technically there is no need to write 3.37 as a mixed number, it's already expressed as best as it should be.
You could write it as 3 37/100, if you wanted, which is a mixed number because it has a whole number and a proper fraction, but the term mixed number is really reserved for alternatively expressing improper fractions, like 337/100, for instance, in which the numerator (the top number) is larger than the denominator (the bottom number); such a number can be turned into a mixed number by dividing the 337 by 100, giving an answer of 3 and 37/100 (or, to put it back into the most simple term, 3.37).
A better example of changing an improper fraction into a mixed number would be the number 8/5, which is an improper fraction because the 8 (numerator) is larger than the 5 (denominator); to change it into a mixed number, divide the 8 by 5, giving 1, with a remainder of 3, yielding 1 3/5, read as "one and three-fifths".
337/100 because it has 3 numbers 4 of those number would be 3376 (example) /1000
77778
Dm
There is no equivalent mixed number.
You write 2.875 as a mixed number as: 27/8
It is 106 and 1/4 as a mixed number
It is 6 and 1/100 as a mixed number
4.25 as a mixed number is 4 25/100
How do you write 250% as a mixed number
33.07 = 337/100
How do you write 0.259 as a mixed number.
3.74 = 374/100 = 337/50
There is no equivalent mixed number.
You write 2.875 as a mixed number as: 27/8
4650000 is an integer and there is no sensible way to write it as a mixed number.
Write-72.775 as a mixed number
2.25 = 21/4 3.74 = 337/50
this is how you write 3.1 as a mixed number is ask a parent or teacher or just be stupid
5 and 93/100
how do you write 17 and 6 in mixed number in simplest form