Very probably: a long time!!
It depends on the speed of your counting though, and whether you're counting up in 1s or in googolplexes.
--
Let's suppose you can count at the speed of light. That means that in one second you can count 186,000 digits. Even with that, it would take you approximately 10^18 years to count to googolplex. (That's 1000000000000000000 years, or One Quintillion years) Simply put, if you started counting at light speed the second the Big Bang you'd still be nowhere NEAR googolplex. And larger still is the Googolplexplex and the Graham's Number.
if you count it,it will take you a week and 5 hours to solve it
The name of that number would be Fzgoogolplex it is googolplex^googolplex
If you count one number a second, then it will take 25 minutes.
Oh, dude, after googolplex comes... well, nothing really. I mean, a googolplex is already this insanely huge number with a one followed by a googol zeros. Like, you're not gonna need to count much higher than that in your lifetime, trust me. So, yeah, after googolplex, it's just like, "Yeah, that's it, we're good."
4543 days
if you count it,it will take you a week and 5 hours to solve it
It would take about a googolplex - it doesn't make much difference, in this case, whether you are talking about googolplex of nanoseconds, seconds, or millennia. Nor does it make much difference whether you count a million numbers every second, or take a year for each number. In any case, it would be much, much more than the current age of the Universe.
The name of that number would be Fzgoogolplex it is googolplex^googolplex
Longer than the human lifespan. If the first humans on the planet started counting and instructed their descendants to keep going and the instructions came down all the way through history to you, you still wouldn't be able to come close.
In mathematics, a googol is 10100 (10 to the power of 100), or the number 1 followed by 100 zeros. A googolplex is 10googol, or the number 1 followed by a googol of zeros. A googol and a googolplex are both so large that if one was able to count at lightspeed (i.e. in one second, you can count from 1 to 186,000), it would still take you approximately 1015 years to count to googol and 1018 years to count to googolplex. Both amounts of time are longer than the universe is estimated to have been around. A number larger still than a googolplex is the Graham's number, which is so large that not even power towers can be used to write it out (while a googolplex can also be written as 1010100, Graham's number can't be written with exponents). Graham's number is so large that if you add all the atoms in the universe together, you would still not get to it. But there is a way to calculate Graham's Number. 5 Up arrows^3 equal G1 but that's not Graham's Number 6 uparrows^3 equal G2 so 69 up arrows^3 equal Grahams number
If you count one number a second, then it will take 25 minutes.
it take 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 seconds to count to 100 ; D
No. You cannot even compare a Googol to anything, as googol = 10100. The number of particles in the universe is about 1080. Googolplex (10googol) would take so long to print out that it will take over 520 years to have a computer powerful enough to print this number within the twelve to twenty four months it will take to replace the computer printing it.
Oh, dude, after googolplex comes... well, nothing really. I mean, a googolplex is already this insanely huge number with a one followed by a googol zeros. Like, you're not gonna need to count much higher than that in your lifetime, trust me. So, yeah, after googolplex, it's just like, "Yeah, that's it, we're good."
Yes, googolplex is a number.
That depends on how fast you can count.
60 googolplex seconds