324
31 Get 35 for breakage.
There are 12 inches in a foot. Therefore the 24 inch pavers are 2 foot pavers each with an area of 2*2 = 4 square feet. The area to be paved measures 10*2 = 20 square feet. Therefore you will need 20/4 = 5 pavers.
1
50
9 A square yard is 3 feet across and 3 feet long. 3x3=9
22.5
792 would be what calculates but it depends on the exact measurements of the 220 square feet.
8'x9' = 72 square feet. You'll need 72 1' x 1' pavers.
164 of them. Get 180 in case of breakage.
To determine how many 15x15 pavers are needed to cover a 350 square foot patio, first calculate the area of one paver. Each paver measures 15 inches by 15 inches, which converts to 1.25 feet by 1.25 feet, resulting in an area of 1.56 square feet per paver. Dividing the total patio area (350 square feet) by the area of one paver (1.56 square feet) indicates that approximately 224 pavers are needed. Always consider purchasing a few extra pavers to account for cuts and breakage.
A 12x12 inch paver is one square foot. So you would need 240 square feet.
To determine how many brick pavers are needed to cover a 12 x 14 area, first calculate the area in square feet: 12 feet x 14 feet = 168 square feet. Next, find out the size of the brick pavers, as this will affect the total number needed. For example, if each paver is 1 square foot, you would need 168 pavers; if they are smaller, divide the total area by the size of one paver to find the exact number needed.
You would need 320 pavers to cover 160 square feet with 6x9 pavers, assuming each paver covers 0.5 square feet.
To calculate how many 4x8 pavers are needed for a 10x12 patio, first find the area of the patio: 10 feet x 12 feet = 120 square feet. Next, calculate the area of one paver: 4 feet x 8 feet = 32 square feet. Finally, divide the patio area by the paver area: 120 square feet ÷ 32 square feet = 3.75. Since you can't have a fraction of a paver, you'll need 4 pavers to cover the patio completely.
16"=1.33" 1.33 x 1.33 = 1.7689 sq ft 224 / 1.7689 = 126.63 pavers
31 Get 35 for breakage.
Any reason why it shouldn't be 220, apart from the shape of the area?