9.1x10^2J
its 140c daily on saturn
140°C equals 284°F
lowest -140c highest +20c
Butane boils at -1C and melts at -140C. Therefore, at -4C it is a liquid.
650 pounds of #20 Silica Sand and 275 pounds of #9lb Pea Gravel
Degrees F = Degrees C * 1.8 + 32 So, 140C = 284F. If you are converting a recipe, in the US this would probably be a 300 degree oven.
This is a mathematical word problem. Since we're using the modifier "decreases" we understand our problem will be substraction.-60C - 80C = -140C.
It will have to cope with much greater heat in a conventional oven. However, as oven-ware it must have been fired and glazed in a kiln, where it would be subjected to greater heat than a domestic provides. If you decide to try it, use a cold oven to start and then a low heat [140C] for half an hour then cool in oven.
melting point- 136 degree C boiling point- 140 degree C
There's many ways to do this sort of thing....but two you should always remember because they work so well with almost everything. 1. Evaporation. No two things have exactly the same boiling point. Say you've mixed ink (with an imaginary boiling point of 140c) and water (100c b.p) and you now want to separate them. Just heat the solution to 110 and boil off the water, collect it and you're done. Although this way you are likely to get a bit of ink leftover....you could just do it again. And you may destroy the ink due to the heat. So using a rotary evaporator is encouraged. They're great. 2. Chromatography. There's many different types but all essentially involve solvating your mixture (now, the mobile phase) and passing it through a stationary phase. The different ways the chemicals interact with each phase dictates how strongly they will stick to either and therefore allow them to separate out. It's worth mentioning that you'll likely still need to do some evaporation to rid of the solvent afterward...but don't let that put you off. Chromatography is more sensitive and precise, you don't need to know boiling points or risk destroying anything, you can separate a tonne of different things at once...it's all good.
I am searching too, but I do not plan to pay any $150 for a big loop lever for my Marlin 1894SC. If I have to I want to buy a used or new plain lever and build a big loop myself. I recently bought a Lincoln 140c mig welder and I also have a Dremel tool to cut the lever then add metal and weld it back . I bet some blacksmith has built them before . carelock@suddenlink.net and my name is David if anyone can help. thanks
Zero degrees Celsius (or centigrade) is the same as 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Therefore, if you convert the temperature to Fahrenheit, and we are working on a twice (as cold) minus reduction, then tomorrow could be 16 degrees Fahrenheit?it doesn't ask for Fahrenheit. if it is 0 now and twice as cold tomorrow, 0 x 2 = 0. it will be 0 degrees Celsius.If we use the Kelvin scale 0'C = 273.15'K so twice as cold would be 546.3' K or 273.15' C not a realistic answer for Earthly temperatures.Another Answer"Double the coldness" is meaningless. "Cold" is merely a lack of heat. Temperature is a measure of heat, not cold. Moreover, even if you could measure "coldness", you would have to use some unit of measurement that starts at zero when there is no coldness, and increases as it gets colder (the opposite of temperature). I'm not talking about Kelvin, because the zero on the Kelvin scale is set where there is no heat, not where there is no coldness. Presumably, the point of "zero coldness" would be the point at which the highest possible temperature is obtained, and therefore there is no coldness at all. But theoretically, there is no maximum temperature, and therefore no point of "zero coldness". But, even if you could establish what the maximum possible temperature (and therefore the zero point on your "coldness" scale) was, it would be so high that doubling coldness would result in a temperature of less than absolute zero, which is impossible. For example, even if the maximum possible temperature was as low as 600 degrees F (and we know that the average star burns many, many times hotter than that), 600 degrees F is approximately 316 degrees C, or 589 K. If you set your "zero coldness" at this point, 589 K, and increased your coldness measure by 1 for every 1 degree decrease in K, your coldness measurement would reach 316 at 0 degrees C. If you double this, you have a coldness measurement of 632, which equates to a Kelvin temperature of -43. But negative Kelvin temperatures do not exist. QED - there is no such thing as "twice as cold".