Directly proportional. Greater speed - greater distance.
velocity=distance/time -or- v=d/t
distance = velocity x time so on the graph velocity is slope. If slope is zero (horizontal line) there is no motion
Velocity
I assume you refer to the formula distance = velocity x time. If an object moves upward, the distance would become the height.
Not sure what you mean exactly. At constant velocity, the distance travelled is proportional to the time.
Distance Traveled is directly proportional to velocity. This is because velocity is the change in position over a period of time. The greater the velocity, the greater the distance traveled. For you calculus junkies, integrate velocity to get displacement.
Time and distance traveled are directly proportional only if the velocity of the object in question is constant.
The distance travelled by a particle is proportional to time when the particle moves with a constant velocity. This means that for every unit of time that passes, the particle covers a consistent amount of distance.
They are related through the formula distance = time x velocity (assuming constant velocity).
Velocity = Distance / Time Velocity is defined as the change in Distance travelled over the Time taken to travel across it at this average rate of velocity. Therefore, average velocity and time are inversly proportional to one another, while distance is directly proportional to both time and velocity, and vice versa. At a fixed velocity, the travel time increases as the distance becomes longer; if the distance is fixed, then the velocity must become greater to make the time shorter.
The relationship between mass, distance, and speed is defined by the laws of motion. Specifically, Newton's second law of motion states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force applied to it (which is related to its mass) and inversely proportional to its mass. Distance and speed are related through the concept of velocity, which is the rate of change of an object's position with respect to time.
Yes, the distance traveled by a car is directly proportional to its velocity. This relationship is described by the formula distance = velocity x time, where time is the duration of travel. The faster the car is moving (higher velocity), the more distance it will cover in a given amount of time.
The equation that shows how frequency is related to velocity and wavelength is: [frequency = \dfrac{velocity}{wavelength}]. This equation illustrates that frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength: as wavelength increases, frequency decreases and vice versa, while velocity remains constant.
Viscous force is directly proportional to the velocity gradient, which represents the change in velocity per unit distance. This means that the higher the velocity gradient, the greater the viscous force acting on the fluid.
Centripetal acceleration is directly proportional to velocity squared and inversely proportional to the radius of the circular path. This means that as velocity increases, centripetal acceleration increases, and as the radius of the circle increases, centripetal acceleration decreases.
No, frequency is not directly proportional to distance. The frequency of a wave is determined by its source and is not directly related to the distance it travels. However, factors such as the medium through which the wave travels can affect its frequency.