no, but broons are deff toogs, lol
"All gleems are bloogs" leaves room for the possibility that there are a lot of bloogs that are not gleems. Yes, everytime you see a gleem, you can assume he is a bloog, but when you see a bloog, you don't know for certain whether he is a gleem or not. "Some toogs are bloogs" doesn't tell us whether any of the toogs are gleems. The toogs could be the bloogs that are not gleems for all we know. So, we do not have enough information to determine whether any toogs are gleems. They could be. Nothing in the statements excludes that possibility. But the information we are given does not prove whether or not they are. So the answer your teacher is probably looking for is "false." =================================================== Let me give you another explanation: Some airplanes are toys. (They make toy airplanes.) All teddy bears are toys. Therefore, some airplanes are teddy bears: true or false? Some snacks are cookies. All Oreos are cookies. Therefore, some snacks are Oreos: true or false? Airplanes are not teddy bears. But some snacks are Oreos. It could go either way. The original question does not have enough information to determine the answer.
Some of them might have it others might not but they are definitely in walmarts
Be more specific what is a "term" and an "expression" I am gonna assume by term you mean terms of a sequence, of course you can. Take a sequence of functions, each function is a graph, some of them can be written as expressions. My argument is definitely Calculus.
Everyday pencils are less than 100g in weight. (Some of the ridiculously large "souvenir" pencils may be over 100g.)
easy sneak him a viagra I'm over 60. Would you like to try out some of your thoughts on me? Let's experiment. Perhaps you could write a book about it. You might get rich and famous. P.S. I hope the first answer above was intended as, and will be taken as, just a joke. It is definitely NOT a good idea, and could have serious medical consequences that could end up with him in a hospital and you in a jail.
False, the Bekes who are Broons are not necessarily among the Bekes who are Toogs.
"All gleems are bloogs" leaves room for the possibility that there are a lot of bloogs that are not gleems. Yes, everytime you see a gleem, you can assume he is a bloog, but when you see a bloog, you don't know for certain whether he is a gleem or not. "Some toogs are bloogs" doesn't tell us whether any of the toogs are gleems. The toogs could be the bloogs that are not gleems for all we know. So, we do not have enough information to determine whether any toogs are gleems. They could be. Nothing in the statements excludes that possibility. But the information we are given does not prove whether or not they are. So the answer your teacher is probably looking for is "false." =================================================== Let me give you another explanation: Some airplanes are toys. (They make toy airplanes.) All teddy bears are toys. Therefore, some airplanes are teddy bears: true or false? Some snacks are cookies. All Oreos are cookies. Therefore, some snacks are Oreos: true or false? Airplanes are not teddy bears. But some snacks are Oreos. It could go either way. The original question does not have enough information to determine the answer.
some are definitely
Some definitely do.
Some Things Have Definitely Changed - 2010 is rated/received certificates of: USA:PG (video rating)
There's definitely some in the Zoo.
Definitely not telling.
Yes. Definitely. some have herpes, some have the clap, some have vaginosis
Definitely the Hiroshima dome
The Amazon Rainforest, definitely :)
Definitely not military victories
Most definitely -_-