answersLogoWhite

0

Is 0x3 equals 0 a zero factor law?

Updated: 4/28/2022
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

Yes.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

O

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

0

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is 0x3 equals 0 a zero factor law?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Other Math

What law states that the total pressure of a confined gaseous mixture equals the sum of individual gas pressures?

Daltons law


What is 27x 3 using the algebraic distributive law?

27x + 3 use distibutive law to factor


Why is a number divided by 0 equal to infinity?

You cannot divide a number by zero. This is easily explained by a simple example with the reverse operation of division, which is multiplication. For any nonzero number A, find the value of B such that A/0 = B This means that there would have to be some number B such that B x 0 = A and there is no such number by the law of multiplication by zero. Likewise, even for the huge number ∞, you would have the expression A/0 = ∞ and be faced with the impossible equation ∞ x 0 = A While it is tempting to imagine infinity as the inverse of zero, this is not the case. Zero is a defined value, while infinity is not.


What is the property of 3x7 plus 2 equals 3x7 plus 3x2?

3(7 + 2) = 3x7 + 3x2 is an example of the distributive law.The distributive law connects multiplication and addition.


Why is any number raised to a negative power is what it is?

That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.Consider this sequence:103 = 1000102 = 100101 = 10100 = 110-1 = 1/1010-2 = 1/100Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.Consider this sequence:103 = 1000102 = 100101 = 10100 = 110-1 = 1/1010-2 = 1/100Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.Consider this sequence:103 = 1000102 = 100101 = 10100 = 110-1 = 1/1010-2 = 1/100Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.Consider this sequence:103 = 1000102 = 100101 = 10100 = 110-1 = 1/1010-2 = 1/100Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.

Related questions

How do you calculate series?

Kirchoff's second law......... Sum of the current at any junction equals to zero.


How do you calculate series current?

Kirchoff's second law......... Sum of the current at any junction equals to zero.


What does the law of conversation of momentum mean?

The law of Conservation of Momentum is the result of The Law of Equilibrium, Force equals zero. When Force is zero, Momentum is constant, dP/dt = f = 0. dP/dr = 0 gives P = k a constant.


When does newtons third law is applicable to bodies?

When the the sum of forces equals zero, or when Conservation of Energy Condition exists..


What is a zero-one law?

A zero-one law is the law that, in some mathematical circumstances, the probability of an event can only be zero or one and not any intermediate value.


Is floridas zero tolerance law implemented administratively?

Yes, Florida's zero tolerance law is implemented administratively.


What property is be illustrated in the equation -12 plus 12 equals 0?

Identify the law illustrated by: 12m + 0 is the same as 12m.


How are first and second law of motion alike?

The first and second law are f=ma. The first law is where f or a is zero . The second law says f-ma where f or a is not zero.


How can nawtons first law be derived from newtons second law?

The Second Law is Force = Mass times Acceleration. The First Law can be derived from the Second Law by setting the Focre to zero or the Acceleration to zero;. No force = no acceleration; or No acceleration = no force.


What law is associated with PV equals c?

Boyle's Law


Why should the y intersect of any Beer's law plot equal zero?

Beer's law says that absorbance is directly proportional to concentration. So if there is zero concentration there should be zero absorbance (0,0).


What is the 'zero tolerance' law regarding drunk driving?

The zero tolerance law refers to if a person is under 21 and they are caught driving under the influence, no matter what percentage you blow, if its not a zero you are under arrest.