Yes, it is.
2, 3, 4, and 6: Yes 5, 9, and 10: No
432/3 = 144 432/4 = 108 432 is divisible by both 3 and 4.
No. divisible by 3 4 5 is 60
2463. The trick is that a number is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3. 1+3+2+4 = 10 (not divisible by 3), while 2+4+6+3 = 15 (divisible by 3).
If sum of digits of a number is divisible by 3 then the number is divisible by 3. Sum of digits = 1+3+4+5+6 = 19 and 19 is not divisible by 3. So 13456 is not divisible by 3.
No, 228 is divisible by 4.
There are an infinite series of numbers that are divisible by 228. Two of them are 456 and 684.On the other hand, if the questioner had meant "what is 228 divisible by?", then the answer is 2, 3, and 19, of which 2 applies twice.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 19, 38, 57, 76, 114, 228
yesYes, 228 divided by 3 is 76.
2, 3, 4, and 6: Yes 5, 9, and 10: No
232 / 6 = 228 r 4
228
No, it is not.
I am all of these: 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276, 288.
No since only numbers in which its sum can be divisible by 3 is divisible by 3. 2 + 4 + 4 is 10, and 10 is not divisible by 3.
It divides exactly by 3, but not 4.
12 is the Lowest Common Multiple
are 2 and 8 divisible by 4