It is rational
300 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 5 x5 and sqrt(2) is irrational then sqrt(300) is irrational
It is a rational number.
Yes since it can be turned or is a fraction.
sqrt(45) = sqrt(9 x 5) => sqrt(9 X 5) = sqrt(9) X sqrt(5) sqrt(9) = 3 Rational However sqrt(5) = 2.236067977..... which is Irrational. Remember Rational X Irrational = Irrational Hence sqrt(45) is irrational NNB The square roots of Prime number , '5' being a prime, are irrational.
It's the ratio of 5 and 1 ... a rational number.
5.4 = 5 2/5 = 27/5 so it is a rational number.
No, 6 over 5 is not irrational. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. In this case, 6 over 5 simplifies to the rational number 1.2, which can be expressed as a ratio of 6 to 5.
5
Any fraction involving whole numbers is RATIONAL.
Both can be either. For example, 1.4 is a rational decimal. 1.41421356 (...) is the decimal representation for sqrt(2), an irrational. 2/5 is a rational fraction. sqrt(2)/3 is an irrational fraction.
It is real and irrational.
5 over 8 is a rational number.
Rational, since it can be written as 25/1 .
√99 = Square root of 99 = Irrational. Rational # are able to be expressed as the ratio of 2 integers. i.e. √25 = +5 5 = 5/1 = rational Irrational # can not be expressed as a ratio of 2 integers.
You can divide 65 by rationals and irrationals: Divided by a rational: 65 ÷ 13/2 = 10 Divided by an irrational: 65 ÷ √13 = 5√13
1). Any number that you can write down completely, using digits, decimal point, and fraction bar, is a rational number. So yes, 5/7 is rational. 2). Any number that can be written as the ratio of two whole numbers is rational. 5/7 is the ratio of 5 to 7. So yes, it is rational.
It is rational.