It's false because we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5 and vice versa, we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5.
No, 549 is not divisible by 5.
No. 15 is divisible by 5.
The numbers that are divisible by 5 has 5 or 0 at the end.So,this numbers are divisible by 5.5,10,15,25,555,10000,etc.
No. 15, 25, 35, and 1675 are divisible by 5, but not by 10. However, every number divisible by 10 is also divisible by 5.
To determine if 494 is divisible by 4, we need to check if the number is evenly divisible by 4 without any remainder. To do this, we look at the last two digits of the number, which in this case are 94. To check if 94 is divisible by 4, we need to see if 94 is a multiple of 4. Since 94 is not a multiple of 4 (as it is not evenly divisible by 4), we can conclude that 494 is not divisible by 4.
1, 2, 5, 10, 13, 19, 26, 38, 65, 95, 130, 190, 247, 494, 1235, 2470.
247, 494 (=247*2), 741 (=247*3) etc.
No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.
it is 494 D=500 XD=490 V=5 IV=4 XDIV=494
YES. 285 is divisible by 5. A number is divisible by 5 if it ends with 0 or 5
35 is divisible by 5 because any number that ends in 5 is divisible by 5.
Yes, 1255 is divisible by 5, and any number that ends in 5 is divisible by 5.
A leap year is divisible by 4, usually - so 1976/4 = 494 then yes 1976 was a leap year
It's false because we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5 and vice versa, we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5.
No, because 1 is not evenly divisible by 5. However, all numbers divisible by 5 are divisible by 1.
5/5715 = 0.000874891 5 is not evenly divisible by 5715. However, 5715 is divisible by 5. (If a number ends in 5 or 0 it is divisible by 5.) 5715/5 = 1143