Well, let's take a moment to look at this question. To see if a number is divisible by 3, you can add up the digits and see if that sum is divisible by 3. For 780, 7 + 8 + 0 = 15, which is divisible by 3. But for 320, 3 + 2 + 0 = 5, which is not divisible by 3. So, 780 is divisible by 3.
Now, to check if a number is divisible by 5, you can see if the last digit is 0 or 5. In this case, 780 ends in 0, so it's divisible by 5. However, 320 does not end in 0 or 5, so it's not divisible by 5. So, 780 is divisible by both 3 and 5, while 320 is only divisible by 5.
Yes, 780 is divisible by 3. You get a whole number. 780/3=260
No, its not able to divide equally
No because it will have a remainder
No - 614/3 = 204.6 recurring (that is, 204.6666...)
855 and 875 are both evenly divisible by 5. 855 is evenly divisible by 3, but 875 isn't.
Yes, 780 is divisible by 3. You get a whole number. 780/3=260
780 is divisible by 2 because it's even. 780 is divisible by 3 because its digits total a multiple of 3. 780 is divisible by 5 because it ends in a 0. 780 is divisible by 10 because it ends in a 0.
No.
Yes. answer is 236
No, its not able to divide equally
No because it will have a remainder
No - 614/3 = 204.6 recurring (that is, 204.6666...)
855 and 875 are both evenly divisible by 5. 855 is evenly divisible by 3, but 875 isn't.
Yes: 471 / 3 = 157
To determine if a number is divisible by 3, you can add up the digits of the number and check if the sum is divisible by 3. For 313, the sum of the digits is 3+1+3=7, which is not divisible by 3. For 351, the sum of the digits is 3+5+1=9, which is divisible by 3. Therefore, 351 is divisible by 3, but 313 is not.
Not evenly; the division is 3111974.333...
No, it is not divisible by 3 Alternative answer Yes it is divisible by 3 but not to a whole number 705,220 divided by 3 = 235073.333333r e.g. three people won £705.220 on the lottery, if they divided the money equally they would each get £235,073.33
I think the question is mistyped, and should be "Is 414 evenly divisible by 3?" i.e. does it divide by 3 without leaving a remainder. The answer is yes. A quick way to tell if a number is divisible by 3 is to add the digits and if the total is divisible by 3, then the number in question is also divisible by 3 4 + 1 + 4 = 9 and 9 is divisible by 3 414 ÷ 3 = 138
320 is divisible by 2, 4, 5, 8 and 10. Those are only the whole numbers, though. It can be divided by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, but it equals a decimated number. 320/2=160. 320/3=106.666666667. 320/4=80. 320/5=64. 320/6=53.3333333333. 320/7=45.7142857143. 320/8=40. 320/9=35.5555555556. 320/10=32. So, technically, 320 can be divided by every number, even ones higher than it (for example, 320/1234=0.25931928687). I dislike mathematics because of this large complication. So, in the end, you should have asked "What is 320 divisible by in whole numbers: 2, 3, 5, 9 or 10?" because this also would have been correct in English grammar. Hope this helps and doesn't just confuse you like it does to me... he he.
330 is divisible by 3 , 10 and 11.
Not without a remainder: 731 ÷ 3 = 243 remainder 2
No.371/3 = 123 2/3 (one hundred and twenty three and two thirds).
Clearly, both 810 and 910 are divisible by 5. A wee trick regarding numbers that are a multiple of 3, is that the component numbers, when added together, are divisible by three. So, 654 is divisible by 3, as 6+5+4 = 15 which is divisible by 3. In your example, 810 components add up to 9, which is divisible by 3. But the components of 910 add up to 10 which is not so divisible.
No, it is not try adding up all the digits if the sum can be equally divided by 9 then it is divisible 3+6+9+4=22
260