An irrational number.
That's an irrational number.
No, no repeating decimal is irrational. All repeating decimals can be converted to fractions. They are, however, non-terminating.
No. Any terminating or repeating decimal is rational.
Only as an approximation. An irrational number is equivalent to a non-terminating, non-recurring decimal. That is, an infinitely long decimal number without any repeating pattern.
No.
It is an infinite non-repeating decimal which represents an irrational number.
An irrational number has a decimal representation that is non-terminating and non-repeating.
No, it cannot.
No. A rational number is any terminating numeral. A repeating decimal is irrational.
No.
A terminating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, repeating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, non-repeating decimal is an irrational number.
An irrational number.
Decimal representations of irrational numbers are non-terminating and non-repeating.
That's an irrational number.
true
Not necessarily. Remember that the definition of an irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a simple fraction. 2/3, for example, is rational by that definition even though its decimal form is a repeating decimal. Since irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions, they don't have fraction forms. So basically, numbers with repeating decimals are considered rational. Irrational numbers don't have repeating decimals.