If it stops there as 0.7 then it is a terminating decimal number
An irrational number is a number that has no definite end and a terminating number is a number that has a definite end. So this means that a decimal that is terminating cannot be irrational.
Yes
An irrational number is not a terminating decimal and it also can't be expressed as a fraction.
A terminating decimal is a number whose decimal representation stops (or terminates) after a finite number of places. For example, 2.5, 2.3345688756 or even 325.452222222 A non-terminating decimal is one that goes on forever.
A decimal without a remainder is a whole number or integer.
.634 is a rational no. bcz it is terminating
3 is natural number, a whole number, an integer, a terminating decimal, and a rational number. It is not an irrational number.
It is a rational number, with a terminating decimal representation. It is not a whole number but comprises a fractional part.
9,230,10,207... but you could divide it be any number but you might not always get a whole or terminating number
A whole number.
No. Every rational number is not a whole number but every whole number is a rational number. Rational numbers include integers, natural or counting numbers, repeating and terminating decimals and fractions, and whole numbers.
Well, if you want the truth 7 is a whole number not a decimal. ========================================= Also, if what you wrote is all there is of it, then it must be terminating, because there was no more of it to write.
If it stops there as 0.7 then it is a terminating decimal number
The number you've written in the question is a terminating number.
In non-decimal form, it is either a whole number of written as a fraction (a ratio) of two whole numbers. In decimal form, it is either terminating or (after a finite number of digits) recurring.
An irrational number is a number that has no definite end and a terminating number is a number that has a definite end. So this means that a decimal that is terminating cannot be irrational.