true
The opposite of the absolute value of -8 is -8. This assumes that "opposite" refers to additive inverse, although there is no justification for such an assumption.
For each girl: 4 kittens per cat, 4 cats per basket, 2 baskets, 2x4=8 8x4=32 32x4=128 8x3=32 1x2=2 128+32+2=162x4=648 legs.The above assumes two girls have left the bus. Alternately:Assumptions:> Assumes the girls are not yet off the bus as stated "6 girls are travelling on the bus... two girls are _getting off_ the bus" and as a result are still on the bus at the time of the leg count> Assumes that the kittens are with the cats in the basket and not at home> Assumes there is a driver and they have legs, but are not included as they are not referenced in the statement> Assumes no other passengers, animals, milliepedes or other creatures on the bus> Assumes no disembodied legs aboard> Assumes no tables with legs> Assumes legs on bus seats as information not provided> Assumes "standard" number of legs per animal / person> Assumes there is no ticket inspector> Assumes the baskets don't have legs> Assumes health and safety investigator/Animal Safety officer not on board to monitor 20 cats per basket. These are some big baskets.6 girls with 2 legs each= 6 * 2 legs= 12 legs6 girls have 2 baskets of 4 cats with 4 legs each= 6 * 2 * 4 * 4 legs= 192 legs6 girls have 2 baskets of 4 cats with 4 kittens with 4 legs= 6 * 2 * 4 * 4 * 4 legs= 768 legsTotal Legs= 12 + 192 + 768= 972 legs
The most that you can get is 52% but that assumes you did not get any answers wrong. Is that realistic?
800. Without a decimal one assumes is a whole no & thousand are whatever precedes the last 3 zeros.
102.8 = 630.9573 This assumes that the base for the logs is 10. If the base was e then it is likely that "exp" would be used instead of "antilog"
True. (apex)
Proof in which one assumes the opposite of what you have to prove is indirect proof. In indirect proof a person can draw a conclusion from assuming the opposite is true and then find a conclusion.
Indirect reasoning is a method of proving a statement by showing that its negation leads to a contradiction or inconsistency. Instead of proving a statement directly, one assumes the negation of the statement and derives a contradiction to demonstrate that the original statement must be true.
For comparing quality, the opposite of "premier" (superior) could be inferior or poor. Where premier assumes the very best, the opposite is worst or poorest.
The opposite of the absolute value of -8 is -8. This assumes that "opposite" refers to additive inverse, although there is no justification for such an assumption.
The opposite of "commits" (does, as with a crime) would be does not commit, which like many actions could mean to eschew or avoid. The opposite of "commits" (assumes an obligation by choice) could be defers, vacillates, wavers, or waffles.
If one assumes that there are no gods, and the bible is a work of fiction wirtten by man the difficulties cease to exist. Dragons fly in fiction, but in reaslity they would be too heavy to do so. As they do not actually exist there is no problem with the contradiction.
The fallacy of inverse in logic and reasoning occurs when someone assumes that if a statement is true, then its opposite must also be true. This is a mistake because just because a statement is true does not mean its opposite is automatically true as well.
The major downfall for the buyer using EXWorks is that he assumes all responsibility for the purchase. While he does set up the guidelines for the receipt of the sale, the seller takes no responsibility for what is received or how it arrives once the buyer's conditions are met.
The employer usually assumes the role of the buyer, and the employee assumes the role of the seller.
assumes fact
A pessimist is one who always assumes something bad has happened, or will happen. The opposite, someone who always expects good things and happy events, is an optimist.