No it is not. 85 and 99 and co-prime so the only positive whole number in common is 1.
there is none
No.
According to the property of symmetry of equality,if a = b then b = a.While this seems pretty obvious, note than "greater than", for example, does not exhibit this property.
For a given perimeter, the circle has the largest area possible.
114 1/2 is one of infinitely many possible answers.
No.
No, it is not.
Suppose x and y are two terms with GCF k where the assumption (in this context) is that k is greater than 1. That implies that x = pk and y = qk where p and q are coprime terms. Then x + y = pk + qk and, using the distributive property, this is k*(p + q).
Yes, it is possible to secure a mortgage for an amount greater than the purchase price of a property through a loan known as a "jumbo mortgage." These loans are typically used for high-value properties and can exceed the traditional loan limits set by government-sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
w= widthw+4=length2(w+l)= perimeter2(w+w+4)=32 substitution2(2w+4)=324w+8=32 distributive property4w=32-8 subtraction property of equality4w=24w=6 division property of equalitylength is 6+4 or 10cm.
Inertia depends on the mass of an object. The greater the mass, the greater the inertia.
An Archimedean property is the property of the set of real numbers, that for any real number there is always a natural number greater than it.
this is not possible
The property that describes an object's resistance to changing its motion is inertia. This property is quantified by an object's mass, where objects with greater mass have greater inertia.
It is not possible to have a probability greater than 1. All probabilities are between 0 and 1, inclusive.
No, it is not possible to divide 15 by a mixed number and get a quotient that is greater than 15.
an explosive eruption.