answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

For positive integers, it is true that the largest factor of any number is itself

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it true that the largest factor of any number is itself?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is it true that a prime number is a whole number greater than 1 that has only itself and 1 as a factor?

It is true.


Is every number a factor of itself?

it is true because a factor of a number is a number that divides the supplied number perfectly with no remainders. This includes the actual number. For instance, consider the number 14. The digits 1, 2, 7, and 14 are 14 factors.


The GCF of a group of natural numbers the largest number that is a factor of all the numbers in a group?

Yes, that is true.


Which is a true statement about number 1?

The integer 1 is a whole number that is neither a prime or a composite number because it has only one factor which is itself.


What must be true for a number to be described as composite?

It must have at least one more factor in addition to '1' and itself.


The largest amount of a population that can be supported by an are is limiting factor true or false?

the largest amount of a population that can be supported by an are is its limiting factor


Is every number a factor of 1 true or false?

As stated, that is false. Every number is not a factor of 1. 1 is a factor of every nonzero whole number.


Is it true that one is a factor of every prime number?

Yes, that is the definition of a prime number, having only two possible factors, one and the prime number itself.


Does any number that has a 2 as a factor have a 4 as a factor?

No; this statement is not true. The number 6 is an example of why this is not true.


Is the only factor greater than half itself?

That's true.


Is it true that the only factor greater than half is itself?

Yes.


Does any number that has 7 as a factor also have 2 as a factor and why?

No, this statement is not true. 21 is an example of why this is not true.