0
What else can I help you with?
What is the quotient of two integers with the same sing?
The quotient has a positive sing in that case.
Is 9.7 an integer?
No, 9.7 is not an integer. An integer is a whole number without any fractional part or decimal. In this case, 9.7 has a decimal part, making it a decimal number rather than an integer. Integers include numbers like -3, 0, 5, and 100, which do not have decimal parts.
Is 0.001 a integer number?
An integer is a whole number that can be positive, negative, or zero. In this case, 0.001 is not an integer because it is a decimal number and not a whole number. Integers are typically represented as -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, without any fractional or decimal parts.
How do you place the decimal point in the quotient when dividing a decimal by a whole number?
The decimal point goes in the quotient the moment you reach the decimal point in the dividend and need to use the digit in the tenths column. When using the "Bus stop" method, the digits will line up so that the decimal point goes in the quotient directly above the decimal point in the dividend.Using the Bus stop method, it is easiest to put the decimal point in the quotient above the decimal point in the dividend first (before any any division calculation is done) and then do the division by ignoring the decimal points and putting digits in the quotient as normal; except if once all the digits of the dividend have been used there is a non-zero remainder, zeros can be added to the end of the dividend as they are trailing zeros after a decimal point which make no difference to the number.eg dividing 1.2 by 5:First place the decimal point in the quotient over the decimal point in the dividend:_____.___------5_|_1.2Now divide as normal:____0.2__------5_|_1.2____1 0____----______2Used up all the digits of the dividend but have a remainder, so add trailing zeros after the decimal point and finish the division:____0.24__--------5_|_1.2000____1 0____----______20______20______---_______0Only needed one extra 0, but it did not hurt putting three of them.→ 1.2 ÷ 5 = 0.24Sometimes the decimal may recur or not terminate; in that case, stop when the required level of accuracy is reached (rounding by calculating a further digit and using that as the deciding digit).
What is the quotient of 60 and 12?
The quotient of 60 and 12 is 5. Quotient is the result of division, where the dividend (in this case, 60) is divided by the divisor (in this case, 12) to get the quotient (5). This means that if you divide 60 by 12, you will get 5 as the result.
What is the quotient of two integers with the same sing?
The quotient has a positive sing in that case.
What is the quotient of two integers of 3.2?
It looks like you are asking what quotient of two integers equals 3.2 ; if that is the case, then: 3.2 = 32/10, which simplified is 16/5.
How do you write a rational number as a repeating decimal?
Follow these steps:write the rational number in the form p/q where p and q are integers and q > 0.divide p by q.if the division process goes into an infinite loop, in which case the decimal representation is the quotient which will be a repeating decimal.if the division process comes to a stop then reduce the last digit of the quotient by 1 and add an infinite string of 9s.
Is 0.3636363636 rational?
Yes, the number 0.3636363636 is rational because it can be expressed as a fraction. Specifically, it is a repeating decimal that can be written as ( \frac{36}{99} ) or simplified to ( \frac{4}{11} ). Rational numbers are defined as numbers that can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, which applies in this case.
How do you show the number 15 is rational by writing it as a quotient of two integers?
You can write any integer as a fraction, by placing the number one in the denominator. In this case, 15/1.
Why are fractions rational numbers but not every rational number is a fraction?
'Rational' in a mathematic sense means 'can be written as a finite fraction'. Since you can obviously write a fraction as a fraction - by a triviality - it is rational. Rational numbers also include the integers; however these can also be written as fractions in the form a/1, so technically every rational number is a fraction.Note to the author of the above quote: - I don't believe that is correct. Here's why:A fraction is a number that expresses part of a whole as a quotient of integers (where the denominator is not zero).A rational number is a number that can be expressed as a quotient of integers (where the denominator is not zero), or as a repeating or terminating decimal. Every fraction fits the first part of that definition. Therefore, every fraction is a rational number.But even though every fraction is a rational number, not every rational number is a fraction.Why? Consider this:Every integer (all the whole numbers, including zero, and their negatives....-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3...) is a rational number, because it can be expressed as a quotient of integers, as in the case of 4 = 8/2 or 1 = 3/3 or -3 = 3/-1 and so on. So integers such as 4 or 1 can be expressed as the quotient of integers.But an integer is not a fraction. 4 is an integer, but it is not a fraction. 4 is not expressed as the quotient of integers. The difference here is in the wording.A fraction is a number that expresses part of a whole. An integer does not express a part. It only expresses a whole number.A rational number is a number that can be expressed as a quotient of integers, or as part of a whole, but fraction is a number that is (must be) expressed as a quotient of integers, or as part of a whole - there is a difference. The difference is subtle, but it is real.In a nutshell, the fractions are a subset of the rational numbers. The rational numbers contain the integers, and fractions don't.
Is 9.7 an integer?
No, 9.7 is not an integer. An integer is a whole number without any fractional part or decimal. In this case, 9.7 has a decimal part, making it a decimal number rather than an integer. Integers include numbers like -3, 0, 5, and 100, which do not have decimal parts.
Are fraction rational number?
A fraction is a number that expresses part of a whole as a quotient of integers (where the denominator is not zero).A rational number is a number that can be expressed as a quotient of integers (where the denominator is not zero), or as a repeating or terminating decimal. Every fraction fits the first part of that definition. Therefore, every fraction is a rational number.But even though every fraction is a rational number, not every rational number is a fraction.Why? Consider this:Every integer (all the whole numbers, including zero, and their negatives....-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3...) is a rational number, because it can be expressed as a quotient of integers, as in the case of 4 = 8/2 or 1 = 3/3 or -3 = 3/-1 and so on. So integers such as 4 or 1 can be expressed as the quotient of integers.But an integer is not a fraction. 4 is an integer, but it is not a fraction. 4 is not expressed as the quotient of integers. The difference here is in the wording.A fraction is a number that expresses part of a whole. An integer does not express a part. It only expresses a whole number.A rational number is a number that can be expressed as a quotient of integers, or as part of a whole, but fraction is a number that is (must be) expressed as a quotient of integers, or as part of a whole - there is a difference. The difference is subtle, but it is real.In a nutshell, the fractions are a subset of the rational numbers. The rational numbers contain the integers, and fractions don't.Note: Mathematicians do not generally use the term "fractions." They usually only talk about rational numbers. Fractions are more or less a term that is used for pedagogical reasons.It's kind of funny. Someone uses a term not used in math to teach math, then makes up tons of tests about "fractions, improper and proper fractions," etc. and tests you on them, even though they are not mathematical terms. Go figyah!
Which two integers is 41 between?
41 is between the integers 40 and 42. This can be determined by understanding that integers are whole numbers without any decimal or fractional parts. In this case, 41 is one unit greater than 40 and one unit less than 42 on the number line.
Is 5.444a rational number?
A rational number is a number that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, where the denominator is not zero. In this case, 5.444 is a terminating decimal, which means it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Therefore, 5.444 is a rational number.
How do you find the mean of 5 integers?
Add the integers together, then divide it by the number of integers there are, (in this case 5)
Is 0.001 a integer number?
An integer is a whole number that can be positive, negative, or zero. In this case, 0.001 is not an integer because it is a decimal number and not a whole number. Integers are typically represented as -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, without any fractional or decimal parts.
