Yes, and you can find this in two ways: by making their denominators the same or by expressing them as decimals (calculator).
Same denominator:
2/3 x 5/5 = 10/15
3/5 x 3/3 = 9/15
so 2/3 is larger than 3/5
Decimals (divide with calculator):
2/3 = 0.666 (repeats)
3/5 = 0.60
so 2/3 is larger than 3/5
No. Two-thirds is (16 and 2/3 percent) less than four-fifths.
To compare 0.6 and two-thirds, we need to make their denominators the same. Two-thirds can be written as 0.666... (repeating decimal) when converted to a decimal. Therefore, 0.6 is less than two-thirds because 0.6 is equivalent to six-tenths, which is less than six-tenths and six-hundredths.
Well 2 is less than half of 5...... and 3 is more than half of 4. Therefore: three fourths is more than two fifths.
three fifths is bigger.
-- "Three eights" is 24. That's way bigger than three fifths.-- Three eighths is 37.5% less than three fifths.
Yes, it is.
An (uncountable) infinitude of numbers, including two thirds, seven tenths, and pi fifths.
To compare 0.6 and two-thirds, we need to make their denominators the same. Two-thirds can be written as 0.666... (repeating decimal) when converted to a decimal. Therefore, 0.6 is less than two-thirds because 0.6 is equivalent to six-tenths, which is less than six-tenths and six-hundredths.
No. Two-thirds is (16 and 2/3 percent) less than four-fifths.
Two thirds is not larger than four fifths. It's almost 17% smaller.
No, it is not.
yes.
Yes. 2/3 = 10/15, whereas 3/5 = 9/15
Three fourths is more than two thirds.
Well 2 is less than half of 5...... and 3 is more than half of 4. Therefore: three fourths is more than two fifths.
three fifths is bigger.
-- "Three eights" is 24. That's way bigger than three fifths.-- Three eighths is 37.5% less than three fifths.