Yes, and you can find this in two ways: by making their denominators the same or by expressing them as decimals (calculator).
Same denominator:
2/3 x 5/5 = 10/15
3/5 x 3/3 = 9/15
so 2/3 is larger than 3/5
Decimals (divide with calculator):
2/3 = 0.666 (repeats)
3/5 = 0.60
so 2/3 is larger than 3/5
No. Two-thirds is (16 and 2/3 percent) less than four-fifths.
To compare 0.6 and two-thirds, we need to make their denominators the same. Two-thirds can be written as 0.666... (repeating decimal) when converted to a decimal. Therefore, 0.6 is less than two-thirds because 0.6 is equivalent to six-tenths, which is less than six-tenths and six-hundredths.
Well 2 is less than half of 5...... and 3 is more than half of 4. Therefore: three fourths is more than two fifths.
three fifths is bigger.
-- "Three eights" is 24. That's way bigger than three fifths.-- Three eighths is 37.5% less than three fifths.
Yes, it is.
An (uncountable) infinitude of numbers, including two thirds, seven tenths, and pi fifths.
Two thirds is not larger than four fifths. It's almost 17% smaller.
No. Two-thirds is (16 and 2/3 percent) less than four-fifths.
No, it is not.
yes.
Three fourths is more than two thirds.
To compare 0.6 and two-thirds, we need to make their denominators the same. Two-thirds can be written as 0.666... (repeating decimal) when converted to a decimal. Therefore, 0.6 is less than two-thirds because 0.6 is equivalent to six-tenths, which is less than six-tenths and six-hundredths.
Well 2 is less than half of 5...... and 3 is more than half of 4. Therefore: three fourths is more than two fifths.
Yes. 2/3 = 10/15, whereas 3/5 = 9/15
three fifths is bigger.
-- "Three eights" is 24. That's way bigger than three fifths.-- Three eighths is 37.5% less than three fifths.