Unit testing may not be possible in all situations. When object-oriented software is considered, the concept of unit testing changes. Encapsulation drives the definition of classes and objects. This means that each class and each instance of a class packages attributes and the operations that manipulate these data. An encapsulated class is usually the focus of unit testing. However, operations within the class are the smallest testable units. Because, a class can contain a number of different operations, and a particular operation may exist as a part of a number of different classes, the tactics applied to unit testing must change.
You can no longer test a single operation in isolation, but rather as part of a class. To illustrate, consider a class hierarchy in which an operation X is defined for the superclass and is inherited by a number of subclasses. Each subclass uses operation X, but it is applied within the context of the private attributes and operations that have been defined for the subclass. Because the context in which operation X is used varies in subtle ways, it is necessary to test operation X in the context of each of the subclasses. This means that testing operation X in a stand-alone fashion is usually ineffective in the object-oriented context.
No.
There are only two possible outcomes in finding out whether a statement is true or false.In testing a conjecture, even one contradiction is sufficient to disprove it. However, it can never be proven. All you can do is add support to the likelihood that the conjecture is true. But there remains a possibility that some other test will prove it false.Furthermore, in view of Godel's incompleteness theorem, some conjectures cannot be proven to be true even if you can prove that their negation is false.
A number pair consists of two numbers. Usually number pairs have a desirable property such as: their sum is 10 or 9. Or they are both even or both odd.
That is not possible; adding two even numbers always gives an even number
The greatest possible number is 888... (repeating).
It depends on what testing was done during your check up. If the check up was just with your general physician with no additional tests or if the right tests were not done it is possible.
Testing a specific part of a system or even a program. That would be called a component. So it is component testing.
its not desirable coz it reduces peoples powers especially with people who have huge positions whether in church,politics,schools and even in our homes
its not desirable coz it reduces peoples powers especially with people who have huge positions whether in church,politics,schools and even in our homes
Adorable or desirable. Perhaps honorable would be even better.
It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.It is not necessary, but it can help. It is possible to be a tester without knowing any languages. It depends on what kind of testing you are doing. If you are doing black box testing, you are basically running a program to see does it work. To do that you don't need to know any programming or what language it is even written in. If you are doing white box testing, you are looking at the actual code, in which case you will need to know a bit about the language being used.
Raise its price
Without wind tunnel testing and other testing, testing in flight would be even more dangerous to the test pilot, and anyone killed should the aeroplane crash.
No, because they mostly die after testing and the testing is for human medicine. So, even if the testing works on the animal it may not work on us because of different body systems. So again, the answer is NO!
You could harm them or even kill them.
Unfortunately, no.
There are many side-effects to testing in animals such as permanent brain damage, cancer, and even death.